On 12 Apr 2012, george greenfield <[email protected]> wrote: > In message <f0d25a7f52.old_coaster@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk> > Tony Moore <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 11 Apr 2012, george greenfield <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > In message <0326ac7e52.old_coaster@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk> > > > Tony Moore <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > > > Interesting. For you, RPCEmu runs about twice as fast as for me, > > > > which reflects the relative speeds of the Win7 processors. > > > > > > But we're both trumped by Chris Gransden's results for the BB-XM > > > and Pandaboard ...:-) > > > > ... which have processor speeds of only 1.0GHz and 1.5GHz. I wonder > > why RPCEmu should run so fast on slower hardware. > > If 'slower hardware' refers to the BB-XM and Pandaboard, perhaps it's > because they are running RISC OS natively, and not under emulation.
So nothing to do with RPCEmu. Sorry, I misunderstood the table in Chris Grandsden's post. Tony _______________________________________________ Rpcemu mailing list [email protected] http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
