On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 5:42 PM Nicolas Chauvet <[email protected]> wrote: > > Le jeu. 28 janv. 2021 à 18:08, Gary Buhrmaster > <[email protected]> a écrit :
> > CEC is optional to the build itself (but is not optional > > in the rpmfusion spec file; I suppose that could be > > adjusted). If one needs CEC support, there are > > third party COPRs around that provide libcec for > > epel-8 until the libcec maintainer agrees to allow > > one of the people who have offered to support it > > in epel-8 to provide the build. > About libcec on epel8, I've talked with Peter and he asked volunteers > to maintain the epel8 branch to formally request it with an email. I was not the one who offered in the ticket, but the email from the ticket that Peter should have gotten about the offer (from Andrew Bauer, comment 11) was not a sufficient email(*)? In that case, perhaps Peter should update the ticket clarifying what he considers as more "formal", as I certainly felt things were waiting on him, and comment 13 also indicated Andrew was waiting on Peter. FWIW, I don't have any real interest in cec support itself (cec is just too random hit/miss with all the vendor specific extensions), so I'm mostly just watching from the peanut gallery. (*) I am on the CC list, and I got the email, still have it in my archives, so I presume he should have gotten it too, but if not I could forward it to Peter. _______________________________________________ rpmfusion-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
