On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Tony Li <tony...@tony.li> wrote: > > > On one hand, having each hosts in a site deal with multiple PA prefixes > won't be much fun. > > > Fortunately, only the network administrator HAS to deal with the multiple > prefixes, setting up one per provider. After that, everything within the > network can be automated. >
Does this mean renumbering? > > > > On the other, the same connection resilience could be achieved with some > sort of session management function on top of TCP, without resorting to LIS. > > > Absolutely true. But then it might require application changes, which > we'd like to avoid. It would also not be intrinsic in the architecture. > Which architecture? And no application change with ILNP? I thought there'd be application changes with ILNP, although none with the routers. Apps should take only the half of the IPv6 address as host ID, not the whole. -- DY
_______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
