Shim6 does exactly what you describe.
It may even a reasonable approach, although i has not gotten traction.
It is, effectively, a locator / identifier separation in a v ery limited
form.
Yours,
Joel
On 11/13/2012 6:17 PM, Dae Young KIM wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Tony Li <tony...@tony.li
<mailto:tony...@tony.li>> wrote:
Manual renumbering is certainly the last thing that folks want to
do. This is why we're trying to automate it.
I think renumbering could also be automated with the IP hosts, albeit
you might need a shim session layer not to break APP communications.
This is a non-LIS approach which you don't buy, though.
I might be interested in a non-LIS solution with no need for
renumbering, neither for a shim session layer. Since it's a non-LIS
solution even without a shim session layer, the host doesn't have to
change at all.
--
DY
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
rrg@irtf.org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
rrg@irtf.org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
