On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Dae Young KIM <dy...@cnu.kr> wrote: > > > On the other, the same connection resilience could be achieved with some >> sort of session management function on top of TCP, without resorting to LIS. >> >> >> Absolutely true. But then it might require application changes, which >> we'd like to avoid. >> > > And no application change with ILNP? I thought there'd be application > changes with ILNP, although none with the routers. Apps should take only > the half of the IPv6 address as host ID, not the whole. >
I'm mistaken. Perhaps, no change with ILNP; rather TCP has to be changed. The pain would be the same if a shim session layer would be inserted on top of TCP with having the socket interface look the same to APPs...? -- DY
_______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
