On Feb 4, 2014, at 11:30 AM, Scott Brim <scott.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Eggert, Lars <l...@netapp.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> so it looks like the effort to reboot the RRG has fizzled out, since we >> didn't manage to get critical mass for a meeting in London. That's not a >> good sign. >> >> I'm happy to have a conversation on the list or face-to-face in London about >> the future of the group; at the moment, my inclination is to close it in the >> near future, since we seem to have run out of steam. > > Getting together informally in London would be great, because by > sitting down together, even if it's only a few of us, we may generate > enough energy and focus to do something in IRTF. I believe RRG needs > to be complementary with the IETF, and what that would mean to RRG > isn't obvious right now. So I would be delighted if you could set up > a face-to-face. +1 > Please don't kill the mailing list. It doesn't hurt anyone, and having > it around will make it easier to have ad hoc discussions. You can > declare the RRG suspended (it is :-)) but I don't see the point in > expunging it. +1 Eric _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
