Thank you Christian, I have just subscribed successfully. I do have some proposal to contribute which is not of RRG relevance.
"WHERE-awareness or not" however would be RRG relevant. But obviously, the alternative (which I like to call the DiffServ-mantra) shall prevail. That fits to ILNP. That fits to making AS#s the leading part of IPv6 addresses. That will extend the fun with prefix building. But no one should be wondering if IPv6 won't fly like an eagle (in spite of the IPv4 depletion issue). Heiner -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: Christian Huitema <huit...@huitema.net> An: heinerhummel <heinerhum...@aol.com>; rrg <rrg@irtf.org> Verschickt: Mi, 12 Feb 2014 8:43 am Betreff: RE: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Today people are demonstrating against what the NSA is doing persistently. see > http://www.sueddeutsche.de/digital/aktionstag-the-day-we-fight-back-alle-gegen-goliath-1.1884738 > > But what can I deduct from the silence on this list? The IETF work on pervasive monitoring and its prevention is discussed in the "perpass" mailing list: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass. Please feel free to join, participate, write drafts... - -- Christian Huitema -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (MingW32) Comment: Using gpg4o v3.2.34.4474 - http://www.gpg4o.de/ Charset: utf-8 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS+yYUAAoJELba05IUOHVQREQIAKNqxc8Gr7qSbBbE8Q6waWi7 8Wj2LQjjsvgoWKSFk4vQTse4UB/3tuSXPPQF9dIj8xcf655vMBDvwd6hfofUtyFw /sZnGFXZGX7xPGUE+z3uK/b1SqYMci39dHxajK5MwpwO++wMdrvvdMzZsHIHOwtn Oav4ouS27wby/MdmvyduXeAAhKOLWllLcukcZuLsZRYemBXKnLcwNsF9Aguzl064 EkMS2hD38iC/ZjhHtKa96esyUso+tcF7yvKQYT84Njxs2mPF6hkTXt2OulXTljeq 1ykPYWTfArzlRfBZO9OHvRRgtXkPqw/xbacktn7DGEHvB50tjFm9Isdcpo+PclA= =RM3i -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
