On Wed, Jan 28, 2026, at 20:22, Stephen Farrell wrote: > I don't find that motivation sufficient to justify banning what's > used now, when the better/replacement thing is not yet settled. I > think the draft may be controversial if it continues to take that > approach, so I'd encourage the authors to consider backing off from > that.
I said this elsewhere, but no policy implementation is atomic. Do we really need to say that this doesn't apply until the alternative is good enough? -- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
