On Sun, 1 Feb 2026, Carsten Bormann wrote:
A facility to preserve information in the publication form for another 
authoring cycle definitely is, though.

It is my strong impression that's what RFCXML is supposed to be. I realize there are people who consider XML to be unreadable, but I'd prefer to have that fight somewhere else.

Adding MathML to it seems consistent with that plan.

Regards,
John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

--
rswg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to