On Thu, 29 Jan 2026, Carsten Bormann wrote:
On Jan 29, 2026, at 03:41, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
While that is a tour de force of ASCII art (UTF-8 art?) it impresses
me as exactly what we should *not* do.
The objective needs to be that an RFC is accessible, not that each of the
renderings we provide be accessible on its own.
I think we can do better than that. As I noted, the text version RFC 9438
isn't even accessible to me.
The current situation is untenable for accessibility because we render the math
*before* creating the XML.
Oh, definitely, we need to embed MathML (or maybe LaTeX) in the XML, then
let the RPC talk to people who know about math and accessibility to figure
out how to render it.
Regards,
John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
--
rswg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
