Curtis,

What I heard before joining Juniper was that they were quite happy that Cisco 
made this acquisition because they don't use TCAM and they thought Cisco wasted 
a lot of money on a suboptimal technology. 

Irrespectively Yours,

John


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Curtis Villamizar [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 1:42 PM
> To: John E Drake
> Cc: Balaji venkat Venkataswami; Eric Osborne (eosborne); Shankar Raman;
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested from routing
> community
> 
> 
> In message
> <0182dea5604b3a44a2ee61f3ee3ed69e14515...@bl2prd0510mb349.namprd05.prod
> .outlook.com>
> John E Drake writes:
> >
> > http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-
> Parser?Sect1=3DPTO1&Sect2=3DHITOFF&
> > d=3DP=
> >
> ALL&p=3D1&u=3D%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=3D1&f=3DG&l=3D50&s1=3D
> > 71625=
> > 72.PN.&OS=3DPN/7162572&RS=3DPN/7162572
> >
> > Irrespectively Yours,
> >
> > John
> 
> 
> John,
> 
> Thanks.  A better TCAM.  If anything the bashing of conventional TCAM
> in the background reinforces what I said about TCAM being power pigs.
> 
>   There are many disadvantages with the conventional ternary CAM
>   structure, however. Since each cell contains two memory cells, and a
>   mask-and-compare circuit, implementation of a table of size
>   w.times.2.sup.n requires w.times.2.sup.n+1 memory elements, and
>   w.times.2.sup.n mask-and-compare circuits. Since every lookup in the
>   table requires the activation of all the cells, power consumption is
>   proportional to w.times.2.sup.n. For large values of n, the cost is
>   considerable, and the power consumption is prohibitive.
> 
> I'm quite sure radix trie is still more power efficient.
> 
> A 4 bit radix trie (16 entry tables doing four binary radix trie
> operations at once) requires a maximum of 8 SRAM lookups, seldom more
> than 6, and often 4 or less.  This can be pipelined using separate SRAM
> blocks per radix trie stage.  Other highly creative lookup techniques
> exist.
> 
> Curtis


_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to