JunHyeok Heo wrote:
>
> Hi! pascal.
>
> First of all, I am sorry for missing your first letter and i had no experience of
>RTAI.
> I am going to explain what i am thinking as a solution in case of RTL.
> I hope you can use RTL instead of RTAI.
You can do this in either system in almost the same way
> But the following method is not verified.
>
> 1. Install your linux interrupt handler as a soft interrupt handler using
>'rtl_get_soft_irq()'
> 2. In real-time interrupt handler, use 'rtl_global_pend_irq()' to call your linux
>interrupt handler.
For RTAI (as Karim said)
rt_request_linux_irq()
rt_pend_linux_irq()
Regards, Stuart
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pascal Charest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 1:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [rtl] Interrupts
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > So, if I can't call Linux interrupt handler within an RTAI handler, can
> > I use two independant handlers ; one from RTAI and the other from Linux?
> >
> > I've a driver that uses Linux interrupt handler. Then, I want a
> > realtime process that is calling by the same interrupt. When I'm using
> > rt_request_global_irq() and doing nothing in my handler, the system
> > restart or all is ok ; it depends of the Linux driver I use.
> >
> > How can I activate, if I can, Linux handler using the same irq? I've
> > used rt_pend_linux_irq() in my handler but it may crash too.
> >
> > Pascal
> > Charest
> >
> > Karim Yaghmour wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Pascal,
> > >
> > > I beleive the problem comes from the fact that you are calling the
> > > Linux interrupt handler from within an RTAI handler. Since Linux
> > > interrupt handlers might call on lock mechanisms redirected by
> > > RTAI, this is where things get messy.
> > >
> > > Rather than using rt_request_global_irq(), try using rt_request_linux_irq().
> > > What this will do is add your handler to the list of handlers linux
> > > will call when the IRQ happens. Therefore, the normal handler gets
> > > called and so does yours. Your handler can then use RTAI locking
> > > mechanisms to do it's work.
> > >
> > > This is actually currently used from within the RTAI schedulers to
> > > try recovering lost jiffies (this is from start_rt_timer in the upscheduler):
> > > rt_request_linux_irq(TIMER_8254_IRQ, recover_jiffies, "rtai_sched",
>recover_jiffies);
> > >
> > > The recover_jiffies function now gets called every time a timer
> > > interrupt gets to Linux.
> > >
> > > J'espere que ca pourra vous aider ...
> > >
> > > Karim
> > >
> > > Pascal Charest wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I'm trying to catch interruptions with rtai and forcing the linux
> > > > interrupt handler, but I don't know how to do it correctly. In fact, I
> > > > want to use different drivers with my rt_process and to make them
> > > > realtime without changing their code. There is a example of what I want
> > > > to do :
> > > >
> > > > void handler(int irq)
> > > > {
> > > > ... forcing linux interrupt handler
> > > > ... doing my own work
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > int init_module()
> > > > {
> > > > ...
> > > > rt_request_global_irq(IRQ, (void*)handler);
> > > > rt_startup_irq(IRQ);
> > > > ...
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > When I try something, linux stops or the computer restarts when the
> > > > interrupt occurs ; it depends of the rt fonctions I use in my handler.
> > > > Do someone know how to do it?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > >
> > > > Pascal Charest
> > > > -- [rtl] ---
> > > > To unsubscribe:
> > > > echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
> > > > echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > ---
> > > > For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
> > > > http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/
> > >
-- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/
