Nathan Paul Simons wrote: > > It's just that it seems like > applications that require low latency could be deftly handled by using hard > real time, and the low latency patch has a lot of provisos for its use. There > was much discussion on the Linux kernel list about the issues that the low > latency patch raised. While many people said that it Worked For Them(tm), it > looked like the patch would not be compatible with many drivers and perhaps > even platforms (did anyone ever test the patch on anything besides ia32?). The faery dust should Just Work on RTL. This problem report surprises me.. It should also work on non-x86, but the single non-x86 report (PPC) is unpromising. Something Wierd is happening.. -- [rtl] --- To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- For more information on Real-Time Linux see: http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/
- Re: [rtl] RTL + Low Latency patch interference? John Regehr
- Re: [rtl] RTL + Low Latency patch interference... yodaiken
- Re: [rtl] RTL + Low Latency patch interfer... John Regehr
- Re: [rtl] RTL + Low Latency patch inte... yodaiken
- Re: [rtl] RTL + Low Latency patch... David Olofson
- Re: [rtl] RTL + Low Latency patch interfer... David Olofson
- Re: [rtl] RTL + Low Latency patch interference? yodaiken
- Re: [rtl] RTL + Low Latency patch interference... Nathan Paul Simons
- Re: [rtl] RTL + Low Latency patch interfer... yodaiken
- Re: [rtl] RTL + Low Latency patch interfer... David Olofson
- Re: [rtl] RTL + Low Latency patch interfer... Andrew Morton
- Re: [rtl] RTL + Low Latency patch interference... David Olofson
- Re: [rtl] RTL + Low Latency patch interference? David Olofson
- Re: [rtl] RTL + Low Latency patch interference? David Schleef
- [rtl] ISDN + RTLinux Martin Fend
- Re: [rtl] ISDN + RTLinux Ulrich Dziergwa
- Re: [rtl] RTL + Low Latency patch interference? David Olofson
