On Wednesday, 25 April 2012 01:03:15 UTC-4, Ruby-Forum.com User wrote: > > There is a set of examples where people approached more responsibly to > documentation creation, for example: http://www.yiiframework.com, > http://kohanaframework.org,
Bringing up Kohana as an example is particularly silly, since you could practically use the Rails API docs as a reference to use it. For instance: http://docs.kohanaphp.com/libraries/orm/advanced and http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Associations/ClassMethods.html#label-Is+it+a+belongs_to+or+has_one+association%3F (from the previous release of Kohana, btw) These two sections are nearly identical, and they're not the only ones. This isn't plagarism - it's just the natural result of a framework deliberately constructed following the Rails pattern. Back to the topic at hand - are you planning to do anything BESIDES whine on this forum / mailing list? At this point, I'm not even sure which particular missing documentation you're using as an example - method_missing is clearly defined in the stdlib docs, and even if it wasn't this would be the *wrong list* to discuss adding it... --Matt Jones -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-talk/-/UQnV882shFsJ. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
