On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser <li...@ruby-forum.com> wrote:
> Of course it isn't. But it *is* geared to learners, which the official > spec is not. Whatever you say. I (and I'm sure many others) learned from the recommendations and `view source` because that was all there was at the time -- never seemed to be an insurmountable problem. >> Which I see no reason to waste time evaluating > > Then don't waste time expressing unfounded opinions about it. Unfounded? If you recall, I said w3schools *used to be* full of errors; it may or may not still be true, so -- caveat student. That's all. -- Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ hassan.schroe...@gmail.com twitter: @hassan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
