+1 for .NET style (maybe it should be '.Net'?). I find it makes consecutive acronyms easier to read. At any rate, I'd like to avoid mixing the two styles à la Javascript's XMLHttpRequest.
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Jeaye <je...@arrownext.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, >> >> Brendan Eich emailed me expressing a preference for `GC<>` over `Gc<>`. I >> think now is as good a time as any to have the bikeshedding debate :) >> > > To be fair, and I like being fair, both of these are inconsistent within > Rust. If functions_are_like_this then types Should_Be_Like_This or > Maybe_like_this. You know, to be fair. As for .NET vs. Java... let acronyms > be acronyms; choose the Java approach. > > Cheers, > Jeaye > > ______________________________**_________________ > Rust-dev mailing list > Rust-dev@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/**listinfo/rust-dev<https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev> >
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
