--- In [email protected], JGG KahnSr <jacek...@...> wrote:
>although as I keep insisting, I have far too much O scale (quite a bit with
>value-added labor involved) to ever consider parting with it.
> S scale also represents some of that same bridge effect as On30, having more
> mass than HO but providing more efficient space utilization than O scale
> Whether there is the same market for S it is hard to say, as Bachmann
> presumably has much deeper pockets than, say, the Thompsons and a much larger
> distribution system--and is in a position to dictate more firmly with Chinese
> manufacturers
Hi Jace, You just need to get some girls to detassel that O scale crop and
put it on the market( and never look back)
Seems like Bachman would one of these days run out of guys who want to model
weird gauged backwoods shortlines and would have to move into S scale to keep
expanding? I doubt many of the current HO mob are interested in obscure
railroads that were out of business before they were born so the best way to
get them to switch would be new more modern class 1 options? A Bachman Genset
loco for instance could start another modeling revolution, contemporary rail
modeling in a modest S sized space ......dave
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
