I take your point and realized after I'd posted that he would not need to figure out a drive for a GP-38, as presumably (I haven't checked dimensions) a shell would fit on the AM GP-9/18. While I probably won't be a customer, I hope it does become a reality for those that want one.
Jace Kahn General Manager Ceres & Canisteo RR Co./Champlain County Traction Co. > There are a number of factors involved, not least of which is his return on > investment for the work involved. I'm not sure a locomotive body requires > that much more CAD time than a boxcar, but locomotives sell for more. Also, > he has had good response on locomotives so far, while the SAL boxcar almost > died on the vine until it became a last-chance thing (and a number of people > talked it up both on-list and off!). > > Pieter E. Roos > > > --- On Mon, 5/30/11, JGG KahnSr <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don't really mean to be discouraging, but if Jim King > > won't do a MILW ribside boxcar because he can't sell them in > > HO, wouldn't > > that be even more the case with a common diesel > > locomotive? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
