Pieter E. Roos Actually, when someone is trying to built/judge support for a particular project I think it is a breach of "Netiquette" to divert the thread to a different prototype. This isn't a group pizza order where if you don't make it clear you want pepperoni you will be stuck eating anchovies.
This would be especially true if the thread is tied to a specific manufacturer's project. If you really want a different prototype, why not wait a couple of days for the first thread to run it's course, then broach your own idea? It would not apply to the run-of-the-mill "what S really needs" thread. Still, I don't think it rises to the level of moderator action. Pieter Roos --- On Sun, 12/18/11, Carey Probst <[email protected]> wrote: > So should we all just be quiet who > would like a specific engine but who > have no interest in the original one proposed? > > Modeling transition era central PA doesn't need western or > Canadian > engines. A more generic un-decaled one would be fine since > I am not > prototype specific but it has to at least look like it > belongs. > > Carey ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
