Folded and uploaded to trac.

Thank you. I set a positive review.

Yes! In this test, we want to check not only translations by roots
(preserving polygons) but also translations by weights (preserving
alcoves only); e.g. play with the extended Weyl group. And there is
the same question of appropriate "translation factors" for the
fundamental weights. It seems that using the `c_i` just does the
job. I remember having a rationale for this for untwisted/dual
thereof; for type BC, this seems to just work (whereas using the same
translation factors as for the roots breaks); but that might be plain
luck, and the current tests only ensure that the factors are not too
small; they might be too large.

Ok, then this is correct since the lattice of the extended Weyl group is
indeed

\oplus_{i \in I \setminus {0} } \ZZ c_i \omega_i

even for A_{2n}^{(2)}.

Cheers,

Anne

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-de...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to