Hi all,
In very short:
> You are totally independent of Sage, you don't *NEED* to
> contribute to have your version of it evolve
Not quite true: we do pay a heavy price for each and every patch that
is not merged: we have to keep rebasing them. I can tell you that it
*hurts*. We all agree that we should get more patches in *and* we are
working on it.
Another fact: many of the patches in the Sage-Combinat queue have
strong dependencies. This not just because we screwed up our splitting
of the task; it is intrinsic to the things we are developing. In the
dependencies are things that are basically out of our control
(e.g. the patches around #715) that are super technical and that just
take time to get into Sage. Given this, there is nothing we can do but
keep those patches alive. That being said, I certainly take the blame
for not finishing faster the "more functorial patch" faster.
Last fact: many of us spent weeks, if not months, at Sage days this
year training newcomers. Don't worry, we *are* getting strong feedback
from outsiders.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
