On Friday 14 September 2007 16:53, William Stein wrote: > > I'm really thinking that there should be C library that does ZZ[x] with a > > denominator so we wouldn't have to put that logic in cython. That > > library might build on NTL. I'm uncomfortable with code like that in > > cython (but that may just be a result of me liking C & C++). > > FLINT?
Yes, of course, I didn't mean to forget FLINT and actually that feels like a much better choice for a back-end to a C QQ[x] library. While I'm a native C++ speaker, I'm coming to appreciate the viewpoint that such things should be written in C. I guess in the long run we would view FLINT as (entirely) replacing NTL, but that sounds like a pretty long run to me. I keep finding that NTL implemented a lot of stuff. -- Joel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
