On Oct 21, 9:34 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/21/07, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There seems to be some typos in the test of gap.py > > These are not typos. The behavior of gap-4.4.10 changed from that > of gap-4.4.9, and the doctests reflect that change. Evidently for > some reason your gap didn't get upgraded. Try > > sage: !gap > > to see what version of gap you now have.
Actually, I'm seeing the same problems as Jaap. Here are some logs from a "sage -gap" session. First, from an old install I haven't touched for a couple of weeks: GAP4, Version: 4.4.9 of 6-Nov-2006, x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc gap> PolynomialRing(Rationals, 2); PolynomialRing(..., [ x_1, x_2 ]) Next, from a clean 2.8.8 install: GAP4, Version: 4.4.10 of 02-Oct-2007, i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc gap> PolynomialRing(Rationals, 2); PolynomialRing(..., [ x_1, x_2 ]) As far as I can tell, the behavior of GAP hasn't changed here. (I think we had a miscommunication last night... I was trying to report that the gap.py doctest was failing with the latest code, after you changed the doctest; but I didn't say that clearly.) Carl --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
