On Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 3:23:03 PM UTC-8 François Bissey wrote: > > On 12/03/2021, at 12:14, Matthias Koeppe <matthia...@gmail.com> wrote: > > this one? https://pypi.org/project/sagemath-standard/#files > > Even for betas? I was thinking there would only be some for proper > releases. >
Yes, pip handles this fine. It will prefer stable releases over newer beta versions unless `--pre` is used. Well, I should get ready to use that stuff directly rather than the sage > git tarball with stuff that I do not use and that requires special > settings > to figure out where the sources are located. > Sure, makes sense if that is easier for you in the context of the gentoo packaging scripts. >From the side of Sage, there's not really a difference. I've written a bit about the source layout in I've written a bit about the source layout in https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.3#Modularization_and_packaging_of_sagelib -- feedback is very welcome! 9.3 may very well be my last “classic" release of sage. Well, thanks for all your work that has helped make Sage easier to package! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/c56af7cd-a7a9-47e3-8db1-2f9aadc7495cn%40googlegroups.com.
