On Wednesday, May 31, 2023 at 12:01:04 AM UTC+8 Nils Bruin wrote:
I'd say the process for NEP 29 has now become so muddled that it's better to start clean: Set a week (is that enough? do we need more?) for discussion, then open a thread collecting votes *ONLY* (no comments) for another week, count votes -- done. I agree completely this is a good process, and actually tried to follow the good example of the github voting thread (actually even copy & pasted some part of the posting). There have been previous discussions on this topic here on the mailing list and in a github issue and PR ( https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/j1cwbTU8aOU/m/2sTiwdKPBQAJ, https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/30384, https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35403). Good to see that now there are more people participating in the discussion. I'm happy to restart the vote, either now or in a week. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/35cb8ada-d27a-489f-95b7-5948dd188ee1n%40googlegroups.com.
