> Let me know what you think. It will probably piss off everybody, but > I guarantee you it is the most honest thing I've ever written about Sage. >
I like it a lot -- but maybe I'm the choir. :) I can only think of one thing I'd like to see added: a short list highlighting a few of the things that we have fast implementations for in Sage, that trump everything else out there (i.e. HNF) or just don't exist elsewhere. For instance, at the end of #3 on the second page, you could just say "Some of the many algorithms in Sage which either aren't available elsewhere, or are vastly faster than the competition, include ..." I don't think you should spend any time giving details in the abstract, but I think a short list might grab people's attention. Here are a few typos/grammar issues: - You mention three names (Cannon, Steel, Fieker), and then say "I've personally worked with both of those guys ..." - end of pg. 1, a sentence starts with " and in November 2007 ..." - end of pg. 2, pseudotty -> pseudo-tty I really like the last sentence. -cc --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
