On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Robert Bradshaw
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On May 1, 2008, at 2:51 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wrote a new version of my ISSAC talk abstract. What do you think:
> >
> > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/tmp/abstract.pdf
>
> I think the previous abstract (version 2) is much better--this
> abstract seems more a reaction to the recent threads on sage-devel
Thanks for your patience with my experiments. Please see abstract number 3:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/tmp/abstract3.pdf
Let me know what you think. It will probably piss off everybody, but
I guarantee you it is the most honest thing I've ever written about Sage.
-- William
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
