I'm not pissed off about it in fact I think it is a great introduction to Sage. I particularly like the last line. Great job!
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 5:49 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Robert Bradshaw > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On May 1, 2008, at 2:51 PM, William Stein wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I wrote a new version of my ISSAC talk abstract. What do you think: > > > > > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/tmp/abstract.pdf > > > > I think the previous abstract (version 2) is much better--this > > abstract seems more a reaction to the recent threads on sage-devel > > Thanks for your patience with my experiments. Please see abstract number 3: > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/tmp/abstract3.pdf > > Let me know what you think. It will probably piss off everybody, but > I guarantee you it is the most honest thing I've ever written about Sage. > > -- William > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
