Hi, On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 3:11 PM, William Stein<wst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Jul 19, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote: >>> >>> My question now is it really worth solving all of the >>> above issue to keep working with fderivative of pynac? >>> >>> Or should we just restore old "diff" by simply sub-classing it >>> from SFunction like what is being done for "integration" >>> and others? > > At first glance doing this sounds like a really good idea. How hard > would it be for you to make a mock-up prototype of this to more > clearly demonstrate it? I'm definitely not opposed.
Thanks. OK, I will come up with a prototype "diff" hopefully soon. I might need to ask some sage-pynac interface related questions as my current understanding of this interface is limited. Cheers, Golam --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
