On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Rob Beezer <goo...@beezer.cotse.net> wrote: > Thanks, everybody, for the illuminating discussion. > > Is there any objection to deprecating the current .adjoint() function > (which returns a matrix of cofactors) and renaming it as the > "adjugate"? With all the usual procedures and warnings for the > deprecation. That would begin the process to free up "adjoint" for > something else (ideally the conjugate-transpose).
+1 > > Jason - wasn't there some spirited discussion a while ago about using > Python properties? I couldn't find it in a search. > > Rob > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org > -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
