Hi Martin, On 13 Jul., 15:03, Martin Albrecht <martinralbre...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > BTW, Sage's current implementation needs 906.69 s for a > > single multiplication. > > We suck at this it seems :)
Totally. According to the Boothby-Bradshaw article you were referring to, their ideas were supposed to be implemented in Sage. Is that done, yet? I wouldn't like to double the work... Best regards, Simon -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
