On Thursday, 15 March 2012 17:55:31 UTC+8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > Okay, I'll think about your suggestion and changing the merger > procedure. But I'll be honest that this is not too high on my list of > priorities. >
well, I think that Keshav's approach is very important if we want to decrease the huge rate of bitrot we have now with patches that did not make it into a release quickly. As the current scheme of things destroys the history of development, it gets hard to recreate the state of source when the now bit-rotten patch has been working. By the way, is http://hg.sagemath.org/ now officially dead? It didn't change a bit since January or so... Dima -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
