On Thursday, 15 March 2012 20:37:36 UTC+8, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mar 15, 6:34 am, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > On Thursday, 15 March 2012 17:55:31 UTC+8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: 
> > 
> > > Okay, I'll think about your suggestion and changing the merger 
> > > procedure.  But I'll be honest that this is not too high on my list of 
> > > priorities. 
> > 
> > well, I think that Keshav's approach is very important if we want to 
> > decrease the huge rate of bitrot we have now 
> > with patches that did not make it into a release quickly. 
> > As the current scheme of things destroys the history of development, it 
> > gets hard to recreate the state of source when 
> > the now bit-rotten patch has been working. 
> > 
> > By the way, ishttp://hg.sagemath.org/now officially dead? It didn't 
> > change a bit since January or so... 
>
> ??  This is only the "official release" repository, as far as I can 
> tell - and 4.8 was the last official release.  I use it a lot because 
> it's faster than pulling up the file on my own computer :)


it was just down - probably still the aftermath of that power failure they 
had...
 

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to