On Thursday, 24 September 2015 17:02:23 UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote: > > On Friday, September 25, 2015 at 1:51:04 AM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> Just as LLL, and probably even BKZ, are. And I wonder why Sage has LLL >> and BKZ just fine, but cannot take one more relatively common abbreviation. >> > > Google for "LLL" and its in the first 10 hits. I define that as > "relatively common". GQ is not common, not by a long shot. Being used > (widely or not) in a specialized research community only doesn't make it > common. > > > Google is irrelevant here; e.g. google GL and it will not be helpful. Or for QR, a matrix factorisation. Or for LU - another matrix factorisation. However, Mathscinet will tell you QR and LU have many hundreds of papers devoted to them, with these abbreviations in the titles.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
