On Thursday, 24 September 2015 15:45:37 UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote: > > On Friday, September 25, 2015 at 12:36:20 AM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> FYI, Mathscinet finds 8 papers with abbreviation ... >>> >> > That is utterly irrelevant, MathSciNet only indexes research papers. So > its obviously biased towards cutting-edge research. If anything, a large > number of hits on MathSciNet is indicative of an abbreviation *not* being > known outside of a specialized research community. > > I merely wanted to point out that an abbreviation I am insisting on using is not made up by me, but widely accepted in the field. Just as LLL, and probably even BKZ, are. And I wonder why Sage has LLL and BKZ just fine, but cannot take one more relatively common abbreviation.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
