On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:44 PM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > This was a comment I just put on trac #965: "I would make a completely > separate python package, maybe called pysmalljac, which builds > smalljac and makes it usable from Python. It would be on github and > pypi. That's how most Sage development should be done. What a > monster I've created by following the Magma way of doing things > instead of the standard open source best practices..." > > I am recommending to absolutely everybody I talk with about Sage > development that we switch from our current massive monolithic > centralized approach toward standard open source practices. Namely, > lots of smaller libraries, standard open source practices, etc. It > would be really valuable to have a thread on sage-devel about how to > more systematically support this.
Sorry for the vapid response for now, but +1 to this principle. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.