On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:44 PM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This was a comment I just put on trac #965: "I would make a completely
> separate python package, maybe called pysmalljac, which builds
> smalljac and makes it usable from Python.  It would be on github and
> pypi.  That's how most Sage development should be done.  What a
> monster I've created by following the Magma way of doing things
> instead of the standard open source best practices..."
>
> I am recommending to absolutely everybody I talk with about Sage
> development that we switch from our current massive monolithic
> centralized approach toward standard open source practices.  Namely,
> lots of smaller libraries, standard open source practices, etc.   It
> would be really valuable to have a thread on sage-devel about how to
> more systematically support this.

Sorry for the vapid response for now, but +1 to this principle.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to