there is also a small GLPK 4.65 discrepancy coming from a patch that Sage applies, but most distros don't.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 9:39 PM Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Since https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28459 > Sage can use GLPK from the system, if it's version 4.63 or newer. Sage has > 4.65. > The slight discrepancy in GLPK tests is due to this version > difference, and it's harmless. > (I set it to 4.63 to cover many more Linux distros) > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 9:28 PM Emmanuel Charpentier > <emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > THIS WAS A MISTAKE: those resuts are for 9.0.beta6, not beta7. Rebuilding > > beta7 and tests underway... > > > > Sorry for the noise... > > > > Le mercredi 27 novembre 2019 22:07:14 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : > >> > >> I tried to recompile from scratch (i. e. make distclean ; make ; > >> resinsttalling the same optional packages (+ python2) and R packages, then > >> make ptestalllong). This time, I got five transient failures and three > >> permanent failures, none of them due to a crash : > >> > >> | File | Result | P/T | > >> |----------------------------------------------+-------------------+-----| > >> | src/sage/combinat/posets/posets.py | 1 doctest failed | T | > >> | src/sage/plot/animate.py | 7 doctests failed | T | > >> | src/sage/modular/ssmod/ssmod.py | 2 doctests failed | T | > >> | src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx | 1 doctest failed | P | > >> | src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py | 1 doctest failed | P | > >> | src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx | 1 doctest failed | P | > >> | src/sage/misc/latex.py | 1 doctest failed | T | > >> | src/sage/graphs/graph_latex.py | 2 doctests failed | T | > >> > >> The temporary failures have been reported already (except possibly for > >> ssmod). Details of the permanent failures : > >> > >> glpk_backend.py: > >> > >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-11-27-21-45-09-4e9dc047. > >> Git branch: develop > >> Using > >> --optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,python2,sage,sagenb > >> Doctesting 1 file. > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 > >> src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx > >> ********************************************************************** > >> File "src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx", line 2287, in > >> sage.numerical.backends.glpk_backend.GLPKBackend.print_ranges > >> Failed example: > >> p.print_ranges() > >> Expected: > >> glp_print_ranges: optimal basic solution required > >> 1 > >> Got: > >> 1 > >> ********************************************************************** > >> 1 item had failures: > >> 1 of 13 in > >> sage.numerical.backends.glpk_backend.GLPKBackend.print_ranges > >> [554 tests, 1 failure, 3.88 s] > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 > >> src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx # 1 doctest failed > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> Total time for all tests: 4.0 seconds > >> cpu time: 3.9 seconds > >> cumulative wall time: 3.9 seconds > >> > >> gap_packages: > >> > >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-11-27-21-45-16-07798fcc. > >> Git branch: develop > >> Using > >> --optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,python2,sage,sagenb > >> Doctesting 1 file. > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py > >> ********************************************************************** > >> File "src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py", line 8, in sage.tests.gap_packages > >> Failed example: > >> test_packages(pkgs, only_failures=True) # optional - gap_packages > >> Expected: > >> Status Package GAP Output > >> +--------+---------+------------+ > >> Got: > >> #I method installed for Matrix matches more than one declaration > >> Status Package GAP Output > >> +--------+---------+------------+ > >> ********************************************************************** > >> 1 item had failures: > >> 1 of 5 in sage.tests.gap_packages > >> [11 tests, 1 failure, 3.82 s] > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py # 1 > >> doctest failed > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> Total time for all tests: 3.9 seconds > >> cpu time: 3.2 seconds > >> cumulative wall time: 3.8 seconds > >> > >> error.pyx: > >> > >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-11-27-21-45-23-f1e208db. > >> Git branch: develop > >> Using > >> --optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,python2,sage,sagenb > >> Doctesting 1 file. > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx > >> ********************************************************************** > >> File "src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx", line 100, in > >> sage.libs.glpk.error.setup_glpk_error_handler > >> Failed example: > >> res = p.solve() > >> Expected: > >> 0: obj = ... > >> Got: > >> <BLANKLINE> > >> ********************************************************************** > >> 1 item had failures: > >> 1 of 11 in sage.libs.glpk.error.setup_glpk_error_handler > >> [12 tests, 1 failure, 0.90 s] > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx # 1 doctest > >> failed > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> Total time for all tests: 0.9 seconds > >> cpu time: 0.5 seconds > >> cumulative wall time: 0.9 seconds > >> > >> The gap_packages failure is known already ; those pertinent to GLPK are > >> new, AFAICT. They might be cosmetic. > >> > >> HTH, > >> > >> > >> Le mercredi 27 novembre 2019 15:11:18 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : > >>> > >>> Similar results on Debian testing running on core I7 + 16 GB RAM and a > >>> slightly different set of optional packages: > >>> > >>> | File | Result > >>> | P/T | > >>> |----------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------------+-----| > >>> | src/sage/crypto/mq/sr.py | Killed due > >>> to abort | P | > >>> | src/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_sequence.py | Killed due > >>> to segmentation fault | P | > >>> | src/sage/combinat/posets/posets.py | 1 doctest > >>> failed | T | > >>> | src/sage/graphs/generators/smallgraphs.py | 6 doctests > >>> failed | T | > >>> | src/sage/plot/animate.py | 7 doctests > >>> failed | T | > >>> | src/sage/combinat/matrices/hadamard_matrix.py | 2 doctests > >>> failed | T | > >>> | src/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx | Killed due > >>> to abort | P | > >>> | src/sage/coding/databases.py | 2 doctests > >>> failed | T | > >>> | src/sage/misc/latex.py | 1 doctest > >>> failed | T | > >>> | src/sage/misc/persist.pyx | 2 doctests > >>> failed | T | > >>> | src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py | 1 doctest > >>> failed | P | > >>> | src/sage/symbolic/integration/external.py | 1 doctest > >>> failed | T | > >>> | src/sage/repl/load.py | 1 doctest > >>> failed | T | > >>> | src/sage/graphs/graph_latex.py | 2 doctests > >>> failed | T | > >>> | src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_ring_constructor.py | Killed due > >>> to abort | P | > >>> | src/doc/en/reference/sat/index.rst | Killed due > >>> to abort | P | > >>> | src/sage/sat/solvers/dimacs.py | Killed due > >>> to abort | P | > >>> | src/sage/sat/boolean_polynomials.py | Killed due > >>> to abort | P | > >>> | src/sage/misc/remote_file.py | 2 doctests > >>> failed | T | > >>> | src/sage/databases/findstat.py | 29 doctests > >>> failed | T | > >>> | src/sage/interfaces/magma_free.py | 2 doctests > >>> failed | T | > >>> > >>> Details: see enclosed checkerrs2.txt > >>> > >>> HTH, > >>> > >>> > >>> Le mercredi 27 novembre 2019 14:56:36 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit > >>> : > >>>> > >>>> Doubleplusungood... > >>>> > >>>> On Deboan testing running on core i5 + 8 GB RAM, ptestalllong gets me > >>>> (part of) the usual suspects (transient failures, plus 6 (six) permanent > >>>> failures due to abort: > >>>> > >>>> | File | Result > >>>> | P/T | > >>>> |----------------------------------------------------------+---------------------+-----| > >>>> | src/sage/crypto/mq/sr.py | Killed due > >>>> to abort | P | > >>>> | src/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_sequence.py | Killed due > >>>> to abort | P | > >>>> | src/sage/combinat/posets/posets.py | 1 doctest > >>>> failed | T | > >>>> | src/sage/plot/animate.py | 7 doctests > >>>> failed | T | > >>>> | src/sage/combinat/matrices/hadamard_matrix.py | 2 doctests > >>>> failed | T | > >>>> | src/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx | Killed due > >>>> to abort | P | > >>>> | src/sage/misc/latex.py | 1 doctest > >>>> failed | T | > >>>> | src/sage/coding/databases.py | 2 doctests > >>>> failed | T | > >>>> | src/sage/misc/persist.pyx | 2 doctests > >>>> failed | T | > >>>> | src/sage/repl/load.py | 1 doctest > >>>> failed | T | > >>>> | src/sage/graphs/graph_latex.py | 2 doctests > >>>> failed | T | > >>>> | src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_ring_constructor.py | Killed due > >>>> to abort | P | > >>>> | src/sage/sat/solvers/dimacs.py | Killed due > >>>> to abort | P | > >>>> | src/doc/en/reference/sat/index.rst | Killed due > >>>> to abort | P | > >>>> | src/sage/sat/boolean_polynomials.py | Killed due > >>>> to abort | P | > >>>> | src/sage/misc/remote_file.py | 2 doctests > >>>> failed | T | > >>>> | src/sage/databases/findstat.py | 7 doctests > >>>> failed | T | > >>>> | src/sage/interfaces/magma_free.py | 2 doctests > >>>> failed | T | > >>>> > >>>> Details : see the enclose checkerrs.txt > >>>> > >>>> HTH, > >>>> > >>>> Le mercredi 27 novembre 2019 01:28:33 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit : > >>>>> > >>>>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > >>>>> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > >>>>> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> d48a21c149 (tag: 9.0.beta7, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to > >>>>> 9.0.beta7 > >>>>> 22426a509b Trac #28797: 32-bit Python 3 failures in combinat > >>>>> 54072f6c3b Trac #28795: Python 3 overflow in IntegerModRing pow > >>>>> 7f2572fcdf Trac #28685: Upgrade from beautifulsoup to beautifulsoup4 > >>>>> c597ceea70 Trac #28737: remove deprecated stuff in old coercion model > >>>>> a5c1185e7c Trac #28736: fix Texture for negative inputs > >>>>> 6c66325a63 Trac #28698: py3: HTML documentation for GlobalOptions does > >>>>> not show up correctly > >>>>> aa0ac42b16 Trac #28675: Deprecate GraphicsArray import from > >>>>> sage.plot.graphics > >>>>> 5882b7f376 Trac #28564: Tensor Fields and Sections: Naming Consistencies > >>>>> 8f9b67d25c Trac #28304: add type information to _repr_ of Macaulay2 > >>>>> elements > >>>>> e6e616380a Trac #28214: Compute and display graph of nth-preimage tree > >>>>> a5bb40f91c Trac #27838: 5 internet doctests failing in findstat.py > >>>>> 6553536757 Trac #27790: compatibility with cplex 12.9 > >>>>> 3c6a9108c1 Trac #23816: implement left action of matrices on scheme > >>>>> points > >>>>> 9c6f3dab7f Trac #28732: update sagetex to version 3.4 > >>>>> f856552b81 Trac #28748: Python 3 debug build fails to start > >>>>> 232ae1bddc (tag: 9.0.beta6) Updated SageMath version to 9.0.beta6 > >>>>> > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "sage-release" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/15b8e7c8-54d7-4d0a-9f93-8a9930043289%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAAWYfq0Ghty-2KbDWvxyKELs7H8tn9Q3g0wEE7%2BDvtRD0KXcbg%40mail.gmail.com.
