Thank you, Dima !

Upgrading my rebuilt 9.0beta6 to 9.0beta7 on my core i7/16 GB machine gives 
me 14 transient failures and the three permanent failures already knows 
(two GLPK-related and explained by Dima, one related to gap_packages, 
already known and explained). For completeness' sake:

| File                                          | Result             | P/T |
|-----------------------------------------------+--------------------+-----|
| src/sage/graphs/generators/smallgraphs.py     | 6 doctests failed  | T   |
| src/sage/combinat/matrices/hadamard_matrix.py | 2 doctests failed  | T   |
| src/sage/misc/package.py                      | 1 doctest failed   | T   |
| src/sage/symbolic/integration/external.py     | 1 doctest failed   | T   |
| src/sage/plot/animate.py                      | 7 doctests failed  | T   |
| src/sage/combinat/posets/posets.py            | 1 doctest failed   | T   |
| src/sage/coding/databases.py                  | 2 doctests failed  | T   |
| src/sage/misc/persist.pyx                     | 2 doctests failed  | T   |
| src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx  | 1 doctest failed   | P   |
| src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py                | 1 doctest failed   | P   |
| src/sage/repl/load.py                         | 1 doctest failed   | T   |
| src/sage/misc/latex.py                        | 1 doctest failed   | T   |
| src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx                  | 1 doctest failed   | P   |
| src/sage/graphs/graph_latex.py                | 2 doctests failed  | T   |
| src/sage/combinat/designs/ext_rep.py          | 1 doctest failed   | T   |
| src/sage/misc/remote_file.py                  | 2 doctests failed  | T   |
| src/sage/databases/findstat.py                | 59 doctests failed | T   |

Details seemingly identical to what I reported before (available on demand).

HTH,

Le mercredi 27 novembre 2019 22:43:15 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
>
> there  is also a small GLPK 4.65 discrepancy coming from a patch that 
> Sage applies, 
> but most distros don't. 
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 9:39 PM Dima Pasechnik <dim...@gmail.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote: 
> > 
> > Since https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28459 
> > Sage can use GLPK from the system, if it's version 4.63 or newer. Sage 
> has 4.65. 
> > The slight discrepancy in GLPK tests is due to this version 
> > difference, and it's harmless. 
> > (I set it to 4.63 to cover many more Linux distros) 
> > 
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 9:28 PM Emmanuel Charpentier 
> > <emanuel.c...@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote: 
> > > 
> > > THIS WAS A MISTAKE: those resuts are for 9.0.beta6, not beta7. 
> Rebuilding beta7 and tests underway... 
> > > 
> > > Sorry for the noise... 
> > > 
> > > Le mercredi 27 novembre 2019 22:07:14 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a 
> écrit : 
> > >> 
> > >> I tried to recompile from scratch (i. e. make distclean ; make ; 
> resinsttalling the same optional packages (+ python2) and R packages, then 
> make ptestalllong). This time, I got five transient failures and three 
> permanent failures, none of them due to a crash : 
> > >> 
> > >> | File                                         | Result            | 
> P/T | 
> > >> 
> |----------------------------------------------+-------------------+-----| 
> > >> | src/sage/combinat/posets/posets.py           | 1 doctest failed  | 
> T   | 
> > >> | src/sage/plot/animate.py                     | 7 doctests failed | 
> T   | 
> > >> | src/sage/modular/ssmod/ssmod.py              | 2 doctests failed | 
> T   | 
> > >> | src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx | 1 doctest failed  | 
> P   | 
> > >> | src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py               | 1 doctest failed  | 
> P   | 
> > >> | src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx                 | 1 doctest failed  | 
> P   | 
> > >> | src/sage/misc/latex.py                       | 1 doctest failed  | 
> T   | 
> > >> | src/sage/graphs/graph_latex.py               | 2 doctests failed | 
> T   | 
> > >> 
> > >> The temporary failures have been reported already (except possibly 
> for ssmod). Details of the permanent failures : 
> > >> 
> > >> glpk_backend.py: 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-11-27-21-45-09-4e9dc047. 
> > >> Git branch: develop 
> > >> Using 
> --optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,python2,sage,sagenb
>  
>
> > >> Doctesting 1 file. 
> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 
> src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx 
> > >> 
> ********************************************************************** 
> > >> File "src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx", line 2287, in 
> sage.numerical.backends.glpk_backend.GLPKBackend.print_ranges 
> > >> Failed example: 
> > >>     p.print_ranges() 
> > >> Expected: 
> > >>     glp_print_ranges: optimal basic solution required 
> > >>     1 
> > >> Got: 
> > >>     1 
> > >> 
> ********************************************************************** 
> > >> 1 item had failures: 
> > >>    1 of  13 in 
> sage.numerical.backends.glpk_backend.GLPKBackend.print_ranges 
> > >>     [554 tests, 1 failure, 3.88 s] 
> > >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 
> src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx  # 1 doctest failed 
> > >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> > >> Total time for all tests: 4.0 seconds 
> > >>     cpu time: 3.9 seconds 
> > >>     cumulative wall time: 3.9 seconds 
> > >> 
> > >> gap_packages: 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-11-27-21-45-16-07798fcc. 
> > >> Git branch: develop 
> > >> Using 
> --optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,python2,sage,sagenb
>  
>
> > >> Doctesting 1 file. 
> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py 
> > >> 
> ********************************************************************** 
> > >> File "src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py", line 8, in 
> sage.tests.gap_packages 
> > >> Failed example: 
> > >>     test_packages(pkgs, only_failures=True)    # optional - 
> gap_packages 
> > >> Expected: 
> > >>       Status   Package   GAP Output 
> > >>     +--------+---------+------------+ 
> > >> Got: 
> > >>     #I  method installed for Matrix matches more than one declaration 
> > >>       Status   Package   GAP Output 
> > >>     +--------+---------+------------+ 
> > >> 
> ********************************************************************** 
> > >> 1 item had failures: 
> > >>    1 of   5 in sage.tests.gap_packages 
> > >>     [11 tests, 1 failure, 3.82 s] 
> > >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py  # 1 
> doctest failed 
> > >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> > >> Total time for all tests: 3.9 seconds 
> > >>     cpu time: 3.2 seconds 
> > >>     cumulative wall time: 3.8 seconds 
> > >> 
> > >> error.pyx: 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-11-27-21-45-23-f1e208db. 
> > >> Git branch: develop 
> > >> Using 
> --optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,python2,sage,sagenb
>  
>
> > >> Doctesting 1 file. 
> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx 
> > >> 
> ********************************************************************** 
> > >> File "src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx", line 100, in 
> sage.libs.glpk.error.setup_glpk_error_handler 
> > >> Failed example: 
> > >>     res = p.solve() 
> > >> Expected: 
> > >>           0: obj = ... 
> > >> Got: 
> > >>     <BLANKLINE> 
> > >> 
> ********************************************************************** 
> > >> 1 item had failures: 
> > >>    1 of  11 in sage.libs.glpk.error.setup_glpk_error_handler 
> > >>     [12 tests, 1 failure, 0.90 s] 
> > >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx  # 1 
> doctest failed 
> > >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> > >> Total time for all tests: 0.9 seconds 
> > >>     cpu time: 0.5 seconds 
> > >>     cumulative wall time: 0.9 seconds 
> > >> 
> > >> The gap_packages failure is known already ; those pertinent to GLPK 
> are new, AFAICT. They might be cosmetic. 
> > >> 
> > >> HTH, 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> Le mercredi 27 novembre 2019 15:11:18 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a 
> écrit : 
> > >>> 
> > >>> Similar results on Debian testing running on core I7 + 16 GB RAM and 
> a slightly different set of optional packages: 
> > >>> 
> > >>> | File                                                     | Result 
>                           | P/T | 
> > >>> 
> |----------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------------+-----|
>  
>
> > >>> | src/sage/crypto/mq/sr.py                                 | Killed 
> due to abort              | P   | 
> > >>> | src/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_sequence.py   | Killed 
> due to segmentation fault | P   | 
> > >>> | src/sage/combinat/posets/posets.py                       | 1 
> doctest failed                 | T   | 
> > >>> | src/sage/graphs/generators/smallgraphs.py                | 6 
> doctests failed                | T   | 
> > >>> | src/sage/plot/animate.py                                 | 7 
> doctests failed                | T   | 
> > >>> | src/sage/combinat/matrices/hadamard_matrix.py            | 2 
> doctests failed                | T   | 
> > >>> | src/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx                      | Killed 
> due to abort              | P   | 
> > >>> | src/sage/coding/databases.py                             | 2 
> doctests failed                | T   | 
> > >>> | src/sage/misc/latex.py                                   | 1 
> doctest failed                 | T   | 
> > >>> | src/sage/misc/persist.pyx                                | 2 
> doctests failed                | T   | 
> > >>> | src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py                           | 1 
> doctest failed                 | P   | 
> > >>> | src/sage/symbolic/integration/external.py                | 1 
> doctest failed                 | T   | 
> > >>> | src/sage/repl/load.py                                    | 1 
> doctest failed                 | T   | 
> > >>> | src/sage/graphs/graph_latex.py                           | 2 
> doctests failed                | T   | 
> > >>> | src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_ring_constructor.py | Killed 
> due to abort              | P   | 
> > >>> | src/doc/en/reference/sat/index.rst                       | Killed 
> due to abort              | P   | 
> > >>> | src/sage/sat/solvers/dimacs.py                           | Killed 
> due to abort              | P   | 
> > >>> | src/sage/sat/boolean_polynomials.py                      | Killed 
> due to abort              | P   | 
> > >>> | src/sage/misc/remote_file.py                             | 2 
> doctests failed                | T   | 
> > >>> | src/sage/databases/findstat.py                           | 29 
> doctests failed               | T   | 
> > >>> | src/sage/interfaces/magma_free.py                        | 2 
> doctests failed                | T   | 
> > >>> 
> > >>> Details: see enclosed checkerrs2.txt 
> > >>> 
> > >>> HTH, 
> > >>> 
> > >>> 
> > >>> Le mercredi 27 novembre 2019 14:56:36 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a 
> écrit : 
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> Doubleplusungood... 
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> On Deboan testing running on core i5 + 8 GB RAM, ptestalllong gets 
> me (part of) the usual suspects (transient failures, plus 6 (six) permanent 
> failures due to abort: 
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> | File                                                     | Result 
>              | P/T | 
> > >>>> 
> |----------------------------------------------------------+---------------------+-----|
>  
>
> > >>>> | src/sage/crypto/mq/sr.py                                 | Killed 
> due to abort | P   | 
> > >>>> | src/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_sequence.py   | Killed 
> due to abort | P   | 
> > >>>> | src/sage/combinat/posets/posets.py                       | 1 
> doctest failed    | T   | 
> > >>>> | src/sage/plot/animate.py                                 | 7 
> doctests failed   | T   | 
> > >>>> | src/sage/combinat/matrices/hadamard_matrix.py            | 2 
> doctests failed   | T   | 
> > >>>> | src/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx                      | Killed 
> due to abort | P   | 
> > >>>> | src/sage/misc/latex.py                                   | 1 
> doctest failed    | T   | 
> > >>>> | src/sage/coding/databases.py                             | 2 
> doctests failed   | T   | 
> > >>>> | src/sage/misc/persist.pyx                                | 2 
> doctests failed   | T   | 
> > >>>> | src/sage/repl/load.py                                    | 1 
> doctest failed    | T   | 
> > >>>> | src/sage/graphs/graph_latex.py                           | 2 
> doctests failed   | T   | 
> > >>>> | src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_ring_constructor.py | Killed 
> due to abort | P   | 
> > >>>> | src/sage/sat/solvers/dimacs.py                           | Killed 
> due to abort | P   | 
> > >>>> | src/doc/en/reference/sat/index.rst                       | Killed 
> due to abort | P   | 
> > >>>> | src/sage/sat/boolean_polynomials.py                      | Killed 
> due to abort | P   | 
> > >>>> | src/sage/misc/remote_file.py                             | 2 
> doctests failed   | T   | 
> > >>>> | src/sage/databases/findstat.py                           | 7 
> doctests failed   | T   | 
> > >>>> | src/sage/interfaces/magma_free.py                        | 2 
> doctests failed   | T   | 
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> Details : see the enclose checkerrs.txt 
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> HTH, 
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> Le mercredi 27 novembre 2019 01:28:33 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit : 
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" 
> git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html 
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>>> d48a21c149 (tag: 9.0.beta7, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version 
> to 9.0.beta7 
> > >>>>> 22426a509b Trac #28797: 32-bit Python 3 failures in combinat 
> > >>>>> 54072f6c3b Trac #28795: Python 3 overflow in IntegerModRing pow 
> > >>>>> 7f2572fcdf Trac #28685: Upgrade from beautifulsoup to 
> beautifulsoup4 
> > >>>>> c597ceea70 Trac #28737: remove deprecated stuff in old coercion 
> model 
> > >>>>> a5c1185e7c Trac #28736: fix Texture for negative inputs 
> > >>>>> 6c66325a63 Trac #28698: py3: HTML documentation for GlobalOptions 
> does not show up correctly 
> > >>>>> aa0ac42b16 Trac #28675: Deprecate GraphicsArray import from 
> sage.plot.graphics 
> > >>>>> 5882b7f376 Trac #28564: Tensor Fields and Sections: Naming 
> Consistencies 
> > >>>>> 8f9b67d25c Trac #28304: add type information to _repr_ of 
> Macaulay2 elements 
> > >>>>> e6e616380a Trac #28214: Compute and display graph of nth-preimage 
> tree 
> > >>>>> a5bb40f91c Trac #27838: 5 internet doctests failing in findstat.py 
> > >>>>> 6553536757 Trac #27790: compatibility with cplex 12.9 
> > >>>>> 3c6a9108c1 Trac #23816: implement left action of matrices on 
> scheme points 
> > >>>>> 9c6f3dab7f Trac #28732: update sagetex to version 3.4 
> > >>>>> f856552b81 Trac #28748: Python 3 debug build fails to start 
> > >>>>> 232ae1bddc (tag: 9.0.beta6) Updated SageMath version to 9.0.beta6 
> > >>>>> 
> > > -- 
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "sage-release" group. 
> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an email to sage-r...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. 
> > > To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/15b8e7c8-54d7-4d0a-9f93-8a9930043289%40googlegroups.com.
>  
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/9e29c2c3-9349-4212-a195-3b6d58f18b4e%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to