On 31 March 2012 12:47, Volker Braun <vbraun.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > If it is of interest to an academic community then it probably should be > part of Sage ;-)
I'm not against it being incorporated into Sage at some point, but right now I'd rather keep it as a separate package that people can install, and import if they want to use it; but if they don't it will not pollute the name space.... (It contains classes with quite generic names like Problem and Construction.) >From what I can tell, I can use Python distutils, and I can get the SAGE_ROOT from environment variables, so that I can set the include_dirs for the Cython compilation. Then I just give people a tar ball and tell them to run sage -python setup.py. Does this sound a good strategy? Or would it be best to distribute an .spkg ? Can .spkg's install stuff into the site-packages directory outside the sage folder? Also, is there any documentation on sage -pkg? Emil -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
