The purchase page says nothing about the free version. The free version is an evaluation version, and let's you evaluate all features (and thus also the enterprise features).
dirk. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brent G. Ozar Sent: Tue Oct 21 11:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive I hate to disagree with you about your own program, but per this page: http://www.woodstone.nu/salive/purchase.asp "With the Standard Edition you can check upto 1000 entries, with the Enterprise Edition upto 5000 entries. The Enterprise edition also includes ODBC logging (direct logging to a database), while the Standard Edition can only log to a flat text file." If I read that right, the free and standard editions don't have odbc logging.... -------------------------------- Brent Ozar - UniFocus -------------------------------- A man is known by the company he avoids. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 3:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive The same way as the enterprise version.... The free version has ALL options of the enterprise version, with ONE exception being the number of entries (10 for the freeware and 5000 for the enterprise). dirk. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Shook Sent: Tue Oct 21 10:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive How do you get a freeware version to write to a database? Mike >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/21/03 03:36PM >>> They do. I run an enterprise version(to check the network) and a freeware version(to check the enterprise version) logging to the same SQL tables and the database entries are tagged with the hostname. This way you can query items identified by server. -Kevin > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Michael Shook > Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 2:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive > > > But you can however have multiple copies running on multiple machines > right? Will the databases correctly merge data from multiple sources? > > > > Michael Shook > Business Continuity Analyst > Saddle Creek Corporation > 723 Joe Tamplin Industrial Blvd > Macon GA 31217 > 478 742 8740 ext. 105 (work) > 478 256 9318 (mobile) > 478 742 7917 (fax) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.saddlecrk.com > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/21/03 01:30PM >>> > And having a different registry for each too? Let's call Bill (Gates) > and ask to get several registries.... > > > > > > dirk. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Greg A Weigold > Sent: Tue Oct 21 7:18 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive > > > > I can understand the difficulties in multi-threaded approach, but what > about being able to run multiple iterations of SA using different logs > and such... > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------- > ---------------- > This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, > please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the > mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall > not operate to bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant > to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly > permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------- > ---------------- > > > > > "Dirk Bulinckx" <dirk > @woodstone.nu> > Sent by: salive-owner > > > 10/21/2003 10:38 > Please respond to salive > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc: > Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for > servers alive > > > > Comment as author: I know > > > dirk. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Greg D. Moore > Sent: Tue Oct 21 4:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive > > > At 11:45 AM 10/21/2003 +0200, you wrote: > > >Simple answer: no > > > >This would be a 100% rewrite of Servers Alive in order to do > this. And > >that's NOT something we're planning. > > > I can fully understand the reasoning behind this. However as a > customer, let me submit another "this would be helpful' comment. :-) > > > > > > >dirk. > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > >Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Tue Oct 21 11:42 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: [SA-list] Wish List - Multiple threads for servers alive > > > > > >Dirk, > > > >I currently have 505 out of 1000 checks running on servers alive, a > >check cycle takes approx 10-15 mins to run with a 5 min > delay between > >checks. > > > >As such it can be upto 30-35 mins before we see a service as being > >down. > > > >I have managed to shorten the check cycle by making some of the less > >critical checks check every 3 cycles etc. > > > >Can servers alive be made to be multiple threaded eg:- rather than > >running all checks in a single series, it has say half a > dozen series > >check paths and each check 'grabs' its next check in the > cycle. So in > >essence you would have 6 checks running at a single point in time? > > > >This would reduce the check cycle in principle to 5 mins. > > > >Regards > > > >Paul _____________________________________________________________ > __________ > >_ > >______________________________________ > > > >The affairs, business and property of T&N Ltd are being > managed by the > >Joint Administrators, S Freakley, J Gleave, and G Squires. > T&N Ltd is a > > >debtor under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code. > > > > > >To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: > > unsubscribe SAlive > > > > > > > >To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: > > unsubscribe SAlive > > Greg D. Moore Director of IT > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Powerone Media 1-800-6POWER6 > Security Tip: Have you run Windows Update Lately? > > To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: > unsubscribe SAlive > > > > To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: > unsubscribe SAlive > > > > > To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: > unsubscribe SAlive > To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive
