On 25 Apr 2012, at 15:23, Andrew Collier wrote: > I don't have a copy of K&R to hand, but I reckon this is ambiguous (i.e. the > value of g_dwCycleCounter&7 depends on the whether this is evaluated before > or after the += 4. Honestly I'm a bit surprised that the left hand side is an > lvalue at all…).
I don't remember how it came to be like that, but I'd suspect it was fastest with VS6 back in the day. It was pretty nasty, so good riddance to it. Thanks for the fix! :) Si
