On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 3:25 AM Romain Beauxis <romain.beau...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback and encouragement on this one! Should I worry > about the tightness described above or is that something you are able > to adjust for? I noticed that in some transitions the buffered data to > compute the transition was just a hair under the expected buffer > duration. I just pushed a change that seem to fix that. > Thanks for the notification, Romain. I didn't mind the additional tightness at all; completely correcting it here would be no worse than running the end-of-track volume detection script with a different delay. But I will clone the new version of the repository first, and test that. with best wishes, JW
_______________________________________________ Savonet-users mailing list Savonet-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
