scheme-reports  

Messages by Date

• 2012/01/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points Vincent Manis
• 2012/01/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points Alex Shinn
• 2012/01/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points John Cowan
• 2012/01/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points Vincent Manis
• 2012/01/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points Alex Shinn
• 2012/01/10 [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points Vincent Manis
• 2012/01/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification John Cowan
• 2012/01/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2012/01/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2012/01/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification Peter Bex
• 2012/01/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification Jussi Piitulainen
• 2012/01/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2012/01/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Symbol escapes - clarification John Cowan
• 2012/01/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification John Cowan
• 2012/01/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] bytevector/string/vector comments John Cowan
• 2012/01/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] bytevector/string/vector comments Per Bothner
• 2012/01/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] return value(s) of load John Cowan
• 2012/01/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] return value(s) of load Vincent Manis
• 2012/01/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] bytevector/string/vector comments John Cowan
• 2012/01/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] return value(s) of load Alex Shinn
• 2012/01/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification Peter Bex
• 2012/01/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Symbol escapes - clarification Shiro Kawai
• 2012/01/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification John Cowan
• 2012/01/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification Peter Bex
• 2012/01/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Symbol escapes - clarification John Cowan
• 2012/01/09 [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Symbol escapes - clarification Vincent Manis
• 2012/01/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] return value(s) of load Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2012/01/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level John Cowan
• 2012/01/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] return value(s) of load John Cowan
• 2012/01/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] return value(s) of load Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2012/01/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification John Cowan
• 2012/01/09 [Scheme-reports] return value(s) of load Andy Wingo
• 2012/01/09 [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification Shiro Kawai
• 2012/01/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level Alex Shinn
• 2012/01/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level Alex Shinn
• 2012/01/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level Ray Dillinger
• 2012/01/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level Marc Feeley
• 2012/01/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level Alex Queiroz
• 2012/01/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level Andy Wingo
• 2012/01/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level Bakul Shah
• 2012/01/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level John Cowan
• 2012/01/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level Marc Feeley
• 2012/01/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level John Cowan
• 2012/01/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level Marc Feeley
• 2012/01/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level John Cowan
• 2012/01/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level Marc Feeley
• 2012/01/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level John Cowan
• 2012/01/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level Andy Wingo
• 2012/01/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name? Shiro Kawai
• 2012/01/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level John Cowan
• 2012/01/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name? John Cowan
• 2012/01/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] bytevector/string/vector comments Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2012/01/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] bytevector/string/vector comments John Cowan
• 2012/01/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] bytevector/string/vector comments Per Bothner
• 2012/01/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2012/01/03 [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level Marc Feeley
• 2012/01/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name? Stefan Edwards
• 2012/01/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name? Alex Shinn
• 2012/01/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name? John Cowan
• 2012/01/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name? Stefan Edwards
• 2012/01/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name? Alex Shinn
• 2012/01/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name? Aubrey Jaffer
• 2012/01/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name? John Cowan
• 2012/01/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name? Jeronimo Pellegrini
• 2012/01/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name? Jeronimo Pellegrini
• 2012/01/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name? Per Bothner
• 2012/01/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name? Grant Rettke
• 2012/01/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Can a library keep state? Alex Shinn
• 2012/01/02 [Scheme-reports] Can a library keep state? Jeronimo Pellegrini
• 2012/01/02 [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name? Jeronimo Pellegrini
• 2011/12/18 [Scheme-reports] bytevector/string/vector comments Per Bothner
• 2011/12/18 Re: [Scheme-reports] draft 5 available Perry E. Metzger
• 2011/12/18 Re: [Scheme-reports] draft 5 available Alex Shinn
• 2011/12/18 Re: [Scheme-reports] draft 5 available Grant Rettke
• 2011/12/18 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] draft 5 available Grant Rettke
• 2011/12/18 Re: [Scheme-reports] draft 5 available Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2011/12/18 Re: [Scheme-reports] draft 5 available Perry E. Metzger
• 2011/12/18 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] draft 5 available Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2011/12/18 [Scheme-reports] draft 5 available Alex Shinn
• 2011/11/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS small in R6RS library Alex Shinn
• 2011/11/26 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS small in R6RS library Grant Rettke
• 2011/11/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS small in R6RS library OKUMURA Yuki
• 2011/11/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS small in R6RS library Grant Rettke
• 2011/11/24 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS small in R6RS library John Cowan
• 2011/11/24 [Scheme-reports] R7RS small in R6RS library OKUMURA Yuki
• 2011/11/17 Re: [Scheme-reports] How do distributions verify conformance to the standard? Eli Barzilay
• 2011/11/17 Re: [Scheme-reports] What is the role of standardization in things like FFI? John Cowan
• 2011/11/17 Re: [Scheme-reports] What is the role of standardization in things like FFI? David Banks
• 2011/11/17 Re: [Scheme-reports] What is the role of standardization in things like FFI? Grant Rettke
• 2011/11/17 Re: [Scheme-reports] What is the role of standardization in things like FFI? John Cowan
• 2011/11/17 Re: [Scheme-reports] What is the role of standardization in things like FFI? David Banks
• 2011/11/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] What is the role of standardization in things like FFI? John Cowan
• 2011/11/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] What is the role of standardization in things like FFI? John Cowan
• 2011/11/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] What is the role of standardization in things like FFI? Stefan Edwards
• 2011/11/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] How do distributions verify conformance to the standard? Grant Rettke
• 2011/11/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] How do distributions verify conformance to the standard? Andy Wingo
• 2011/11/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] What is the role of standardization in things like FFI? Ray Dillinger
• 2011/11/15 [Scheme-reports] (no subject) Benjamin L. Russell
• 2011/11/15 [Scheme-reports] How do distributions verify conformance to the standard? Grant Rettke
• 2011/11/15 [Scheme-reports] What is the role of standardization in things like FFI? Grant Rettke
• 2011/11/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? John Cowan
• 2011/11/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Andy Wingo
• 2011/11/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Perry E. Metzger
• 2011/11/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Perry E. Metzger
• 2011/11/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Andy Wingo
• 2011/11/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Jim Rees
• 2011/11/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Andy Wingo
• 2011/11/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors? John Cowan
• 2011/11/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors? Aubrey Jaffer
• 2011/10/24 Re: [Scheme-reports] Dedication of R7RS-small Jussi Piitulainen
• 2011/10/24 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan
• 2011/10/24 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Ray Dillinger
• 2011/10/24 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn
• 2011/10/24 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn
• 2011/10/24 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan
• 2011/10/24 [Scheme-reports] Dedication of R7RS-small John Cowan
• 2011/10/24 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Ray Dillinger
• 2011/10/24 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan
• 2011/10/24 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan
• 2011/10/24 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2011/10/24 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Andre van Tonder
• 2011/10/24 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Aubrey Jaffer
• 2011/10/24 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn
• 2011/10/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Aubrey Jaffer
• 2011/10/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Aubrey Jaffer
• 2011/10/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan
• 2011/10/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan
• 2011/10/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Andre van Tonder
• 2011/10/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn
• 2011/10/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Jussi Piitulainen
• 2011/10/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Andre van Tonder
• 2011/10/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Andre van Tonder
• 2011/10/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] initial results of implementor intentions poll John Cowan
• 2011/10/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] initial results of implementor intentions poll Aaron W. Hsu
• 2011/10/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] initial results of implementor intentions poll John Cowan
• 2011/10/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn
• 2011/10/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn
• 2011/10/22 [Scheme-reports] initial results of implementor intentions poll Alex Shinn
• 2011/10/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan
• 2011/10/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Denis Washington
• 2011/10/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Andre van Tonder
• 2011/10/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan
• 2011/10/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Andre van Tonder
• 2011/10/21 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Aubrey Jaffer
• 2011/10/21 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Aubrey Jaffer
• 2011/10/21 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Grant Rettke
• 2011/10/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan
• 2011/10/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn
• 2011/10/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn
• 2011/10/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Grant Rettke
• 2011/10/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan
• 2011/10/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Aubrey Jaffer
• 2011/10/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan
• 2011/10/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2011/10/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan
• 2011/10/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Ray Dillinger
• 2011/10/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Jussi Piitulainen
• 2011/10/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn
• 2011/10/17 Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4 Alex Shinn
• 2011/10/17 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn
• 2011/10/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan
• 2011/10/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4 Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2011/10/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4 John Cowan
• 2011/10/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4 Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2011/10/16 [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Jussi Piitulainen
• 2011/10/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4 John Cowan
• 2011/10/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4 Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2011/10/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] WG2 Scheme and Polymporphism Andre van Tonder
• 2011/10/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4 Jeronimo Pellegrini
• 2011/10/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4 Denis Washington
• 2011/10/14 [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4 John Cowan
• 2011/10/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] WG2 Scheme and Polymporphism Eduardo Cavazos
• 2011/10/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] WG2 Scheme and Polymporphism John Cowan
• 2011/10/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] WG2 Scheme and Polymporphism Denis Washington
• 2011/10/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] WG2 Scheme and Polymporphism Andre van Tonder
• 2011/10/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] WG2 Scheme and Polymporphism Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2011/10/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] WG2 Scheme and Polymporphism Andy Wingo
• 2011/10/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] WG2 Scheme and Polymporphism Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2011/10/14 [Scheme-reports] WG2 Scheme and Polymporphism Denis Washington
• 2011/10/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i) Hans Aberg
• 2011/10/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i) John Cowan
• 2011/10/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i) Aubrey Jaffer
• 2011/10/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Video of John Cowan's R7RS talk at LispNYC online Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2011/10/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i) John Cowan
• 2011/10/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i) Aubrey Jaffer
• 2011/10/01 [Scheme-reports] Video of John Cowan's R7RS talk at LispNYC online John Cowan
• 2011/10/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i) John Cowan
• 2011/09/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281 John Cowan
• 2011/09/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281 John Cowan
• 2011/09/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281 Alex Shinn
• 2011/09/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281 xacc.ide
• 2011/09/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281 Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2011/09/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281 xacc.ide
• 2011/09/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281 John Cowan
• 2011/09/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281 xacc.ide
• 2011/09/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281 Alex Shinn
• 2011/09/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281 John Cowan
• 2011/09/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281 Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2011/09/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281 Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2011/09/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281 Alex Shinn

• Earlier messages
• Later messages