scheme-reports  

Messages by Date

• 2012/11/26 [Scheme-reports] More editorial comments Alan Watson
• 2012/11/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] Inexact numbers and `eqv?`: the post I didn't want to make John Cowan
• 2012/11/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS Mark H Weaver
• 2012/11/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] Inexact numbers and `eqv?`: the post I didn't want to make Mark H Weaver
• 2012/11/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2012/11/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic Per Bothner
• 2012/11/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS Per Bothner
• 2012/11/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS Per Bothner
• 2012/11/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/25 [Scheme-reports] Inexact numbers and `eqv?`: the post I didn't want to make John Cowan
• 2012/11/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS John Cowan
• 2012/11/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic John Cowan
• 2012/11/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS Per Bothner
• 2012/11/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS John Cowan
• 2012/11/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS Mark H Weaver
• 2012/11/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] scheme-report-environment/null-environment only for R5RS John Cowan
• 2012/11/25 [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic Per Bothner
• 2012/11/25 [Scheme-reports] scheme-report-environment/null-environment only for R5RS Per Bothner
• 2012/11/25 [Scheme-reports] Formal Comments to R7RS-small draft John Cowan
• 2012/11/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] Summary of Formal Comments and Objections Peter Bex
• 2012/11/24 Re: [Scheme-reports] Summary of Formal Comments and Objections Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2012/11/24 [Scheme-reports] Summary of Formal Comments and Objections John Cowan
• 2012/11/24 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS John Cowan
• 2012/11/24 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS Mark H Weaver
• 2012/11/24 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS John Cowan
• 2012/11/24 [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS Mark H Weaver
• 2012/11/24 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #456: Adoption of R6RS John Cowan
• 2012/11/24 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #455 (also known as #454): What is a dynamic environment? John Cowan
• 2012/11/24 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #440: Write procedure is not backwards compatible John Cowan
• 2012/11/24 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #439: Bidirectional ports and port-open? John Cowan
• 2012/11/24 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #438 (also known as #437): Inconsistency of sequence copying procedures John Cowan
• 2012/11/24 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #434: List of named characters is incomplete John Cowan
• 2012/11/24 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #430: clarify library loading rules John Cowan
• 2012/11/24 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #424: Add write-string procedure to (scheme base) John Cowan
• 2012/11/24 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #423: When does eqv? return #t for procedures? John Cowan
• 2012/11/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan
• 2012/11/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Ray Dillinger
• 2012/11/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Ray Dillinger
• 2012/11/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Ray Dillinger
• 2012/11/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan
• 2012/11/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Ray Dillinger
• 2012/11/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] let*-values' definition Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2012/11/23 [Scheme-reports] let*-values' definition Jean-Michel HUFFLEN
• 2012/11/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Per Bothner
• 2012/11/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Suggestion to put display and newline in the same library Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/23 [Scheme-reports] Suggestion to put display and newline in the same library Christian Stigen Larsen
• 2012/11/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Per Bothner
• 2012/11/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination John Cowan
• 2012/11/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Shiro Kawai
• 2012/11/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Aaron W. Hsu
• 2012/11/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination John Cowan
• 2012/11/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Aaron W. Hsu
• 2012/11/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] Literal string not quoted speech Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alan Watson
• 2012/11/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
• 2012/11/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
• 2012/11/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination John Cowan
• 2012/11/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Shiro Kawai
• 2012/11/22 [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Per Bothner
• 2012/11/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
• 2012/11/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan
• 2012/11/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
• 2012/11/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan
• 2012/11/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Marijn
• 2012/11/21 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Vassil Nikolov
• 2012/11/21 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alan Watson
• 2012/11/21 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
• 2012/11/21 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Per Bothner
• 2012/11/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
• 2012/11/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan
• 2012/11/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
• 2012/11/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Ray Dillinger
• 2012/11/19 Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers Mark H Weaver
• 2012/11/19 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
• 2012/11/19 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
• 2012/11/19 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan
• 2012/11/19 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/17 Re: [Scheme-reports] equal? Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2012/11/17 Re: [Scheme-reports] Name supported? Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2012/11/17 Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages. Arthur Smyles
• 2012/11/17 Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages. Arthur Smyles
• 2012/11/17 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available John Cowan
• 2012/11/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Vassil Nikolov
• 2012/11/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading John Cowan
• 2012/11/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL John Cowan
• 2012/11/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Noah Lavine
• 2012/11/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL John Cowan
• 2012/11/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL John Cowan
• 2012/11/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] Signaled errors need not raise error objects John Cowan
• 2012/11/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading John Cowan
• 2012/11/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan
• 2012/11/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Helmut Eller
• 2012/11/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Noah Lavine
• 2012/11/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Helmut Eller
• 2012/11/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Vassil Nikolov
• 2012/11/16 [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Helmut Eller
• 2012/11/15 [Scheme-reports] Signaled errors need not raise error objects Alan Watson
• 2012/11/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Helmut Eller
• 2012/11/15 [Scheme-reports] Name supported? Alan Watson
• 2012/11/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alan Watson
• 2012/11/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Shiro Kawai
• 2012/11/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Aaron W. Hsu
• 2012/11/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] equal? Alan Watson
• 2012/11/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] equal? John Cowan
• 2012/11/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL John Cowan
• 2012/11/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Per Bothner
• 2012/11/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL John Cowan
• 2012/11/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Helmut Eller
• 2012/11/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] equal? Jim Rees
• 2012/11/14 [Scheme-reports] equal? Alan Watson
• 2012/11/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available John Cowan
• 2012/11/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Marc Feeley
• 2012/11/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Marc Feeley
• 2012/11/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available Alan Watson
• 2012/11/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Per Bothner
• 2012/11/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL John Cowan
• 2012/11/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Marc Feeley
• 2012/11/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available John Cowan
• 2012/11/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available Alan Watson
• 2012/11/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Helmut Eller
• 2012/11/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Helmut Eller
• 2012/11/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Helmut Eller
• 2012/11/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] Beta reduction Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/14 [Scheme-reports] Beta reduction Helmut Eller
• 2012/11/13 [Scheme-reports] REPL Helmut Eller
• 2012/11/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available Alan Watson
• 2012/11/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] Test suite Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/13 [Scheme-reports] Test suite Helmut Eller
• 2012/11/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages. Aaron W. Hsu
• 2012/11/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages. Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages. Arthur Smyles
• 2012/11/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages. John Cowan
• 2012/11/13 [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages. Arthur Smyles
• 2012/11/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
• 2012/11/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan
• 2012/11/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alan Watson
• 2012/11/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan
• 2012/11/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers John Cowan
• 2012/11/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers Mark H Weaver
• 2012/11/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
• 2012/11/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan
• 2012/11/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers John Cowan
• 2012/11/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers John Cowan
• 2012/11/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers John Cowan
• 2012/11/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] is there a difference between substring and string-copy? John Cowan
• 2012/11/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted John Cowan
• 2012/11/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers Mark H Weaver
• 2012/11/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers Ray Dillinger
• 2012/11/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers Mark H Weaver
• 2012/11/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] is there a difference between substring and string-copy? Per Bothner
• 2012/11/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
• 2012/11/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers Mark H Weaver
• 2012/11/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Comment on draft 7 regarding <non-digit> Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers Noah Lavine
• 2012/11/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] is there a difference between substring and string-copy? Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/11 [Scheme-reports] is there a difference between substring and string-copy? Per Bothner
• 2012/11/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted Per Bothner
• 2012/11/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Per Bothner
• 2012/11/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/11 [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers Mark H Weaver
• 2012/11/11 [Scheme-reports] Comment on draft 7 regarding <non-digit> David Adler
• 2012/11/11 [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
• 2012/11/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted Takashi Kato
• 2012/11/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2012/11/11 [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted Takashi Kato
• 2012/11/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2012/11/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier Per Bothner
• 2012/11/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7 John Cowan
• 2012/11/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier John Cowan
• 2012/11/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2012/11/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] editorial: missing index entry and cross-reference for import Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2012/11/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7 Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Missing # Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2012/11/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier John Cowan
• 2012/11/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] the features function John Cowan
• 2012/11/10 [Scheme-reports] Missing # Takashi Kato
• 2012/11/10 [Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier Per Bothner
• 2012/11/10 [Scheme-reports] the features function Per Bothner
• 2012/11/10 [Scheme-reports] editorial: missing index entry and cross-reference for import Per Bothner
• 2012/11/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Comment on R7RS draft 7 John Cowan

• Earlier messages
• Later messages