scheme-reports  

Messages by Date

• 2012/11/10 [Scheme-reports] Comment on R7RS draft 7 Anders Östlund
• 2012/11/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7 Alan Watson
• 2012/11/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7 Ray Dillinger
• 2012/11/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7 Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7 Takashi Kato
• 2012/11/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7 Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/10 [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7 Takashi Kato
• 2012/11/09 [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] editorial: 2-argument log function Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] editorial: 2-argument log function Per Bothner
• 2012/11/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] editorial: 2-argument log function Alex Shinn
• 2012/11/02 [Scheme-reports] editorial: 2-argument log function Per Bothner
• 2012/10/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] poll: invalid item #315 from 5th ballot Takashi Kato
• 2012/10/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] poll: invalid item #315 from 5th ballot Alex Shinn
• 2012/10/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] poll: invalid item #315 from 5th ballot Alex Shinn
• 2012/10/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] poll: invalid item #315 from 5th ballot John Cowan
• 2012/10/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] poll: invalid item #315 from 5th ballot Takashi Kato
• 2012/10/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS Mark H Weaver
• 2012/10/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS John Cowan
• 2012/10/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS Michael Sperber
• 2012/10/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS John Cowan
• 2012/10/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] set! and imported identifiers Alex Shinn
• 2012/10/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] set! and imported identifiers Aaron W. Hsu
• 2012/10/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] set! and imported identifiers Jim Rees
• 2012/10/13 [Scheme-reports] set! and imported identifiers Marc Feeley
• 2012/10/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS Per Bothner
• 2012/10/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS Michael Sperber
• 2012/10/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs Aaron W. Hsu
• 2012/10/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs Aaron W. Hsu
• 2012/10/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs Vassil Nikolov
• 2012/10/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs Vassil Nikolov
• 2012/10/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs Eli Barzilay
• 2012/10/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs Eli Barzilay
• 2012/10/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Boyle
• 2012/10/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Boyle
• 2012/10/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Boyle
• 2012/10/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Cowan
• 2012/10/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs Aaron W. Hsu
• 2012/10/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Cowan
• 2012/10/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Boyle
• 2012/10/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Cowan
• 2012/10/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Boyle
• 2012/10/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Cowan
• 2012/10/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs Sam TH
• 2012/10/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs Aaron W. Hsu
• 2012/10/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Boyle
• 2012/10/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs Vassil Nikolov
• 2012/10/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs Aaron W. Hsu
• 2012/10/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Boyle
• 2012/10/11 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #453: The denotational semantics John Cowan
• 2012/10/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #435: Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Alex Shinn
• 2012/10/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #440: Write procedure is not backwards compatible Alex Shinn
• 2012/10/11 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS John Cowan
• 2012/10/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #360: Change syntax of escaped symbols from |...| to #"..." John Cowan
• 2012/10/11 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #440: Write procedure is not backwards compatible John Cowan
• 2012/10/11 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #439: Bidirectional ports and port-open? John Cowan
• 2012/10/11 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #438: Inconsistency of sequence copying procedures John Cowan
• 2012/10/11 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #436: Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences John Cowan
• 2012/10/11 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #435: Bytevectors should be called u8vectors John Cowan
• 2012/10/11 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #434: List of named characters is incomplete John Cowan
• 2012/10/11 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #430: clarify library loading rules John Cowan
• 2012/10/11 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #424: Add write-string procedure to (scheme base) John Cowan
• 2012/10/11 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #423: The list of cases where `eqv?` returns `#t` does not mention procedures John Cowan
• 2012/10/11 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #421: #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case have no final delimiter John Cowan
• 2012/10/11 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Cowan
• 2012/10/11 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #372: Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit) John Cowan
• 2012/10/11 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #360: Change syntax of escaped symbols from |...| to #"..." John Cowan
• 2012/09/28 [Scheme-reports] Updated list of latest Scheme releases John Cowan
• 2012/09/19 Re: [Scheme-reports] Definition of expt when the base is exact 0 (was Re: John Cowan's votes and rationales on the seventh ballot) Alex Shinn
• 2012/09/19 Re: [Scheme-reports] Definition of expt when the base is exact 0 (was Re: John Cowan's votes and rationales on the seventh ballot) Mark H Weaver
• 2012/09/19 Re: [Scheme-reports] Definition of expt when the base is exact 0 (was Re: John Cowan's votes and rationales on the seventh ballot) Alex Shinn
• 2012/09/19 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes and rationales on the seventh ballot Mark H Weaver
• 2012/09/19 [Scheme-reports] Definition of expt when the base is exact 0 (was Re: John Cowan's votes and rationales on the seventh ballot) Mark H Weaver
• 2012/09/18 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes and rationales on the seventh ballot Alex Shinn
• 2012/09/18 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes and rationales on the seventh ballot Mark H Weaver
• 2012/09/18 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes and rationales on the seventh ballot John Cowan
• 2012/09/18 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes and rationales on the seventh ballot Alex Shinn
• 2012/09/18 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes and rationales on the seventh ballot Mark H Weaver
• 2012/09/18 Re: [Scheme-reports] (angle -0.0-0.0i) should be -pi, but R7RS-draft-6 prohibits this John Cowan
• 2012/09/18 Re: [Scheme-reports] Updates to draft 6 John Cowan
• 2012/09/18 [Scheme-reports] Updates to draft 6 Steve Hafner
• 2012/09/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] <transformer spec> BNF Taylan Ulrich B.
• 2012/09/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] <transformer spec> BNF Alex Shinn
• 2012/09/09 [Scheme-reports] <transformer spec> BNF Taylan Ulrich B.
• 2012/09/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Daniel Weinreb Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2012/09/08 [Scheme-reports] Daniel Weinreb John Cowan
• 2012/09/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Fixing libraries (was Re: Questions about cond-expand) John Cowan
• 2012/09/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Fixing libraries (was Re: Questions about cond-expand) Aaron W . Hsu
• 2012/09/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Fixing libraries (was Re: Questions about cond-expand) Aaron W . Hsu
• 2012/09/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Fixing libraries (was Re: Questions about cond-expand) Alex Shinn
• 2012/09/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Fixing libraries (was Re: Questions about cond-expand) Per Bothner
• 2012/09/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Fixing libraries (was Re: Questions about cond-expand) Alex Shinn
• 2012/09/06 [Scheme-reports] Fixing libraries (was Re: Questions about cond-expand) Aaron W . Hsu
• 2012/09/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand Aaron W . Hsu
• 2012/09/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand John Cowan
• 2012/09/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand Alex Shinn
• 2012/09/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand John Cowan
• 2012/09/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand Alex Shinn
• 2012/09/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand John Cowan
• 2012/09/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand Alex Shinn
• 2012/09/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand John Cowan
• 2012/09/04 [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand Christian Stigen Larsen
• 2012/09/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" Vassil Nikolov
• 2012/09/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" Ray Dillinger
• 2012/09/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" Ray Dillinger
• 2012/09/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] No (bytevector n ...) ? John Cowan
• 2012/09/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] No (bytevector n ...) ? Alex Shinn
• 2012/08/31 [Scheme-reports] No (bytevector n ...) ? Christian Stigen Larsen
• 2012/08/31 Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" Alex Shinn
• 2012/08/31 Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" Vassil Nikolov
• 2012/08/31 Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" Vassil Nikolov
• 2012/08/31 Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" John Cowan
• 2012/08/31 Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" John Cowan
• 2012/08/31 Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" John Boyle
• 2012/08/31 Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" Aaron W . Hsu
• 2012/08/31 Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" John Cowan
• 2012/08/31 Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" Pierpaolo Bernardi
• 2012/08/31 Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" John Boyle
• 2012/08/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" Ray Dillinger
• 2012/08/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" Ray Dillinger
• 2012/08/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" Per Bothner
• 2012/08/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" David A. Wheeler
• 2012/08/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" John Cowan
• 2012/08/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" Ray Dillinger
• 2012/08/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" David A. Wheeler
• 2012/08/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" Alex Shinn
• 2012/08/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" John Cowan
• 2012/08/29 [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" David A. Wheeler
• 2012/08/26 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] #370 log of zero John Cowan
• 2012/08/26 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] #370 log of zero Mark H Weaver
• 2012/08/24 Re: [Scheme-reports] new wording for eqv? Vassil Nikolov
• 2012/08/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] new wording for eqv? John Cowan
• 2012/08/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? xacc.ide
• 2012/08/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Andy Wingo
• 2012/08/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? John Cowan
• 2012/08/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Alex Shinn
• 2012/08/21 Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Andy Wingo
• 2012/08/21 Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Alex Shinn
• 2012/08/21 Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? John Cowan
• 2012/08/21 Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Daniel Krueger
• 2012/08/21 Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2012/08/21 Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Andy Wingo
• 2012/08/21 Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Peter Bex
• 2012/08/21 Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Aaron W . Hsu
• 2012/08/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Alex Shinn
• 2012/08/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Andy Wingo
• 2012/08/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2012/08/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Andy Wingo
• 2012/08/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2012/08/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Andy Wingo
• 2012/08/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Alex Shinn
• 2012/08/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Andy Wingo
• 2012/08/19 Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Alex Shinn
• 2012/08/19 Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Peter Bex
• 2012/08/19 Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc Andy Wingo
• 2012/08/19 [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Andy Wingo
• 2012/08/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] #460 eqv? deliberations Bill Schottstaedt
• 2012/08/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful. Mark H Weaver
• 2012/08/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful. Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2012/08/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful. Ray Dillinger
• 2012/08/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful. Mark H Weaver
• 2012/08/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful. John Cowan
• 2012/08/13 [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful. Ray Dillinger
• 2012/08/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] #460 eqv? deliberations Mark H Weaver
• 2012/08/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for [email protected] - 13 Messages in 5 Topics Mark H Weaver
• 2012/08/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for [email protected] - 13 Messages in 5 Topics Noah Lavine
• 2012/08/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for [email protected] - 13 Messages in 5 Topics Ray Dillinger
• 2012/08/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for [email protected] - 13 Messages in 5 Topics Alex Shinn
• 2012/08/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for [email protected] - 13 Messages in 5 Topics Noah Lavine
• 2012/08/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for [email protected] - 13 Messages in 5 Topics Alex Shinn
• 2012/08/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for [email protected] - 13 Messages in 5 Topics Emmanuel Medernach
• 2012/08/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for [email protected] - 13 Messages in 5 Topics Noah Lavine
• 2012/08/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] Definition of expt (was #391 - a selection of error predicates) Mark H Weaver
• 2012/08/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] Definition of expt (was #391 - a selection of error predicates) Alex Shinn
• 2012/08/08 [Scheme-reports] Definition of expt (was #391 - a selection of error predicates) Mark H Weaver
• 2012/08/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] (angle -0.0-0.0i) should be -pi, but R7RS-draft-6 prohibits this Vassil Nikolov
• 2012/08/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] (angle -0.0-0.0i) should be -pi, but R7RS-draft-6 prohibits this Alex Shinn
• 2012/08/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] (angle -0.0-0.0i) should be -pi, but R7RS-draft-6 prohibits this Mark H Weaver
• 2012/08/07 [Scheme-reports] (angle -0.0-0.0i) should be -pi, but R7RS-draft-6 prohibits this Mark H Weaver
• 2012/08/03 [Scheme-reports] WG1BallotRead published, John Cowan's comments John Cowan
• 2012/07/19 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/19 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/19 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Andy Wingo
• 2012/07/18 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors John Cowan
• 2012/07/18 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/18 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Marc Feeley
• 2012/07/18 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors will
• 2012/07/18 [Scheme-reports] Preliminary vote Emmanuel Medernach
• 2012/07/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] Automatic delay-force Ray Dillinger
• 2012/07/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] Automatic delay-force Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Andy Wingo
• 2012/07/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Andy Wingo
• 2012/07/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] quasisyntax extension Andy Wingo
• 2012/07/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors John Cowan
• 2012/07/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] (read|write)-char [was Opinion about R7RS] John Cowan
• 2012/07/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Andy Wingo
• 2012/07/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] (read|write)-char [was Opinion about R7RS] Ray Dillinger
• 2012/07/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] decoding strings from bytevectors Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2012/07/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] (read|write)-char [was Opinion about R7RS] Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2012/07/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes on the sixth ballot Ray Dillinger

• Earlier messages
• Later messages