>> Never really cared for LVM. Always used the direct partition approach.
>
> Well, perhaps I can try to convince you some more.
I never used LVM either, but in my defense, these were/are factory
systems where it was extremely unlikely that the system would grow and
require more storage, and if one did, we'd have to remove the smaller
drives and put in bigger ones.
More recently, I've been tasked with caring for systems whose
requirements are much more subject to change, and LVM has proven it's
value there. This is especially true in SAN or virtual environments
where the storage admins might just say "ok, here's another 100gb
'disk' for you".
So, it depends on your environment as much as your preferences. Yeah,
it takes some getting used to, but so did electric typewriters :).
- Bluejay Adametz
If one only wished to be happy,
this could be easily accomplished;
but we wish to be happier than other people,
and this is always difficult,
for we believe others to be happier than they are.
- Charles-Louis Secondat
--
NOTICE: This message, including any attachments, is only for the use of the
intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information,
or information otherwise protected from disclosure by law. If the reader of
this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
use, disclosure, copying, dissemination or distribution of this message or any
of its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in
error, please contact the sender immediately by reply email and destroy this
message, including all attachments, and any copies thereof.
