I read recently that B5/Jeremiah's producer had pitched to reboot it as 
a series in 2005. What do you guys think of that?

Tracey de Morsella (formerly Tracey L. Minor) wrote:
> I rewatched the whole series over the summer. I thought the last two 
> season were decent and there were some decent episodes interspersed 
> throughout season one and two - but it was extremely uneven and there 
> were a lot stupid stuff it took them a while to get rid off.  ie. the 
> naked gel disinfectant massages.  Other stupid stuff they seemed stuck 
> with. ie. "the permanently pouting Vulcan with the swollen lips"  
> ---what a oxymoron or a captain who was so uptight is seemed like he 
> never got any action--even when he did. 
>
> I still say he is trying to do a Ronald Moore.  Too bad they did not get 
> Moore to helm the reboot of Trek
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>   
>> at least in its last season, "Enterprise" did a number of great shows, 
>> so I agree with you.
>>
>> -------------- Original message --------------
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:GWashin891%40aol.com>
>> Well it looks to me like Abrams may have the possiblity of doing more 
>> damage
>> to ST continuity than Enterprise did. Sheesh. Hasn't anyone learned that
>> one can updade a movie without wrecking continuity.
>>
>> -GTW
>>
>>     
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:keop7%40aol.com> wrote: "Daryle" 
>>>       
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:yokozuna%40globalsoulmedia.com> 
>> darylemlockhart
>>     
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, that makes it official. This movie sucks. Time to give Woody Allen
>>> movie #12 so we can just pack it in and go home. They may as well 
>>>       
>> have left
>>     
>>> Berman in charge. Has JJ Abrams SEEN Star Trek?
>>>
>>> J.J. Abrams just loves putting his "stamp" on established material. This
>>> reminds me of the "Superman" script he wrote where Lex Luthor also 
>>>       
>> turned
>>     
>>> out to
>>> be Kryptonian. That didn't go over too well with the fanboys either.
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> **************************************
>> See what's new at http://www.aol.com <http://www.aol.com>
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>  
>>     
>
>
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>   


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to