Tracey, I agree with you. Many of the women I know have expressed serious attractions toward women they consider to be the epitome of beauty.
As for your wordrobe, no one's laughing. I'll wager that several of the gents here are hoping for posted images. "If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody hell hired the director?" -- Charles L Grant http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com From: tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 22:38:38 -0700 Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Megan Fox's Scary Box Office Problem What about Ann Margaret, Ava Gardner, Marilyn Monroe, Angelina Jolie ( before the Anorexia), J-Lo, the blond from Grey's Anatomy, Katherine Heigl, Sophia Loren, Scarlett Johansson, Natalie Portman, Jessica Biel All of them have been in hits I believe and are considered sexy Are you saying women reject sexy women. I think we seek to be them. I do not think the jealousy factor is at work here. I used to love movies with Hot Kick Ass Broads because I wanted to be one. I was taking notes, I was buying bustiers, leathers skirts and thigh high boots. (back in the day, those things were in okay, so stop laughing. I will probably check out Jennifer's Body on DVD, but my sense is it was poorly marketed. Fox has some image problems than include she is nothing but a body and then she star's in a movie called Jennifer's body in which the previews do not reveal that it is a comedy. Some decided to sell in the previews a pure slasher horror. If I had not read the reviews, I would have thought that she decided to play up that she is nothing but a body. Regarding young guys.. none of the previews showed her looking appealing, but instead as an exaggerated terrifying her that looked like she might bite off a guys important part. I knew someone who edited a forum/penthouse letters publication once, and stuff like was considered a no-no when it came to targeting mainstream males. She did not look sexy in the previews, and the previews is what people use to determine whether to go see it. If I were a young guy who thought she was hot, I would have popped in a transformers DVD instead, based on those previews -----Original Message----- From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Kelwyn Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 9:32 PM To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Megan Fox's Scary Box Office Problem I defy you to name a Racquel Welch helmed hit (excluding her first, "One Million Years B.C."). Pam Grier was used and abused (raped and beaten up)in all her movies before she was allowed to kick triumphant butt. Liz Taylor is perhaps the exception that proves the rule but she, too, was slapped around in a number of her iconic roles and the films where she exuded pure female sexual power ("Cleopatra") were not box office hits. And, to be clear about this, the article stated females rejected Fox not for being "too sexy and beautiful" but because of her "pure, raw sexuality," which is something else altogether. Barbie is "too sexy and beautiful." Fox is no Barbie doll. There is an ongoing dynamic going on but you may ignore it if it suits you. ~rave! --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Keith Johnson <keithbjohn...@...> wrote: > > Did I fall asleep? Since when is the pure horror genre driven by female audiences? > And as for women not responding to Fox, is it that she's too sexy and beautiful for them, or (more likely) that she hasn't displayed a range and depth that makes them interested in anything she has to say on screen? I mean, there have been untold numbers of actresses over the years who've been classified as beautiful and sexy in the extreme, from Liz Taylor to Racquel Welch, from Pam Grier to Halle Berry. Such women have always found a female audience, depending on the roles they play. > I think this is more the script and Fox's one-note facial expressions. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kelwyn" <ravena...@...> > To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Monday, October 5, 2009 1:39:45 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern > Subject: [scifinoir2] Megan Fox's Scary Box Office Problem > > > > > > > From Entertainment Weekly, October 9, 2009: > > "Jennifer's Body" deadly $6.8 million debut is attributed to Megan Fox's "sexy-beast" persona proving off-putting to women, without whom a horror movie don't stand a chance. "The genre is driven by the female audience, and I don't know that girls relate to her," says the executive. "Megan leads with pure, raw sexuality, and for girls it's a turnoff." > > Fox's drawing power will be tested again with next summer's western "Jonah Hex," aimed at her core: young guys. > > "If I were cutting the "Hex" trailer," says a studio strategist, "I'd make sure she was in as much of it as possible - in compromising positions." > > I imagine it would do even better if she could be raped during the movie. > > ~(no)rave! > ------------------------------------ Post your SciFiNoir Profile at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/app/peoplemap2/entry/add?fmvn=mapYa hoo! Groups Links _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222984/direct/01/
