> You are right. In the future, we might think of eliminating the > architectures that are clearly wrong from the selection. > > For the toolchain you're using, qemu-arm-0.8.1-sb2 might be the one > you're looking for.
Thanks. But what's the basis for that choice. Where can I learn what these are? For instance, what does "sb2" mean, and why is it better for me than the other ones? On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 12:08 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: > In recent versions of scratchbox 1.0.x, when setting up a new target, we > must choose from a long list in "Select CPU-transparency method". For > instance, I see: > > qemu-arm-0.7.0-sb2 Emulation > qemu-arm-0.8.0-m2 Emulation > qemu-arm-0.8.0-sb2 Emulation > qemu-arm-0.8.1-sb2 Emulation > qemu-armeb-0.8.1-sb2 Emulation > qemu-i386-0.7.0-sb2 Emulation > qemu-i386-0.8.1-sb2 Emulation > qemu-mips-0.8.1-sb2 Emulation > qemu-mipsel-0.8.1-sb2 Emulation > qemu-ppc-0.7.0-sb2 Emulation > qemu-ppc-0.8.0-m2 Emulation > qemu-ppc-0.8.1-sb2 Emulation > qemu-sparc-0.7.0-sb2 Emulation > qemu-sparc-0.8.1-sb2 Emulation > sbrsh Remote execution > > I have already selected the arm-linux-ct401-2.3 compiler in the first > step, so obviously most of these wouldn't make any sense. But still I'm > not sure which of the various qemu-arm or qemu-armeb items to choose. > -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ Scratchbox-users mailing list Scratchbox-users@lists.scratchbox.org http://lists.scratchbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scratchbox-users
