Which vanilla version of qemu your patch is included in?
If it's 0.8.2, you are in luck, because a more recent (unofficial)
version of cputransp devkit can be found from [1].
[1] http://scratchbox.org/~jhakala/unofficial/
Regards,
Jussi
Claudio Scordino wrote:
Riku Voipio wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:12:30PM +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
You are right. In the future, we might think of eliminating the
architectures that are clearly wrong from the selection.
For the toolchain you're using, qemu-arm-0.8.1-sb2 might be the one
you're looking for.
Thanks.
But what's the basis for that choice. Where can I learn what these
are? For instance, what does "sb2" mean, and why is it better for me
than the other ones?
arm = little endian arm
armeb = big endian arm
Generally the bigger the qemu version, the better. However, all
versions qemu are buggy in different ways, so you might actually want
to downgrade to older version if hitting problems.
If you are working on maemo, please refer to their documentation
for selecting preferred qemu version.
sb2 means nothing usefull and will be removed in future
Hi all.
Last week I downloaded the last stable version of Scratchbox (1.0.7) and
I tried to compile for a big-endian arm support.
Surprisingly, I saw that the Qemu big-endian support is still buggy.
Then, my question: did you integrate the patch that we proposed several
weeks ago ? (see
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2006-09/msg00137.html)
In fact, our patched Qemu works fine, whereas Scratchbox Qemu still
seems not working...
Regards,
Claudio
_______________________________________________
Scratchbox-users mailing list
Scratchbox-users@lists.scratchbox.org
http://lists.scratchbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scratchbox-users
